08:55 <guardian> o/

08:56 <guardian> ddfreyne: in case you decide to release 3.7, I believe #251 and #306 are trivial yet useful changes :) (I know I'm biased)

08:57 <ddfreyne> guardian: Haha :) If I release 3.7 they will definitely go in there

08:57 <guardian> *does the release dance*

09:20 <ddfreyne> http://www.musicpd.org/ ← nanoc site

11:47 <musicmatze> Hi there. Currently I have some time to work on my better-error-messages-patch. But I don't know how to fix the failing tests: They fail because Mocha:Mock was passed to #atom_feed instead a Nanoc::Item, which is expected. Don't know how to test this correctly! Maybe someone can help: github.com/matthiasbeyer/nanoc/tree/experimental-4.x-helper-error-msg-improvements

11:51 <ddfreyne> musicmatze: If you feel up to it, kick out all mocks and replace them with actual Nanoc::Item instances

11:51 <ddfreyne> I really dislike mocks :(

11:52 <musicmatze> ddfreyne: Okay, I think I will do this.

11:53 <ddfreyne> musicmatze: Although… could you do that in a separate branch, starting from master? (or release-3.6.x if you want)

11:54 <musicmatze> ddfreyne: Okay, no prob. But if I want to fix my tests, I have to merge this branch some time!

12:06 <musicmatze> Okay, it is not so easy... :D But I will try to do this.

13:16 <Skyr> ddfreyne: You don't like scala? (https://twitter.com/ddfreyne/status/326631048081461248)

13:16 <ddfreyne> Skyr: I do… but there is a girl’s choir named “Scala” in belgium :)

13:17 <Skyr> ddfreyne: Ok, I'm relieved :)

13:28 <darix> musicmatze: btw: thanks for mpd!:p

14:03 <ddfreyne> I’ve been thinking about switching from iTunes to something else

14:04 <ddfreyne> I need a way to easily edit tags (in bulk), and keep my music directory organised, because I do not want to do that manually…

14:07 <stbuehler> kid3 has bulk editing

14:11 <ddfreyne> Automatically renaming files as <artist>/<album>/<no> - <title> should be fairly easy though I guess

14:37 <bobthecow> ddfreyne: Better Rename 9 is awesome for renaming.

19:04 <guardian> o/

20:24 <ddfreyne> Meh… I am still not getting a reply from guard-nanoc’s original author. :(

20:26 <guardian> http://java-0day.com/ never disappoints :)

20:39 <ddfreyne> guardian: Merged your two PRs!

20:42 <guardian> awesome thx

20:42 <guardian> I get your point, yet raw_filename was an existing concept in nanoc. I would have had the same hesitations if a new property appeared out of the blue, populated with [:content_filename]'s value

20:43 <ddfreyne> Yeah, but it’ll all be made irrelevant in nanoc 4.0, so…

20:46 <ddfreyne> alright, off to sleep

20:49 <guardian> o/ thank you denis