20:47 <guardian> with kramdown one can write tables, but e.g. currently I'm using Twitter Bootstrap which expects clases added to <table>, see http://getbootstrap.com/css/#tables

20:48 <guardian> I know I can add {:style="table table-stripped"} but that creates coupling between the item and the CSS framework

20:49 <guardian> I would like to add a level of indirection so that in markdown I speficy the semantic of the table ("stripped") and still decouple that from the exact css class that's going to be outputed

20:49 <guardian> how would you do so?

20:52 <ddfreyne> guardian: This is what I do: https://gist.github.com/ddfreyne/3ed52d5e1437a8e64162

20:52 <ddfreyne> It probably doesn't really solve your problem fully though

20:52 <ddfreyne> I haven't been able to get a good solution yet

20:58 <guardian> from which is this? I don't recall you having a site based on bootstrap

20:58 <ddfreyne> Not a public one

20:59 <guardian> ddfreyne: I think using {:style="bordered"} would work. That effectively just adds style="bordered" which kinda corresponds to a "semantic marker" (sorry for making up expressions to try to convey my ideas)

21:00 <guardian> ddfreyne: then, with sass I'll use @extend so that table.bordered extends everything that needs to turn it into a bootstrap's bordered table

21:02 <ddfreyne> guardian: Seems like agood idea!

21:02 <ddfreyne> I wanted to do something like that as well, in fact

21:02 <guardian> I tried that idea on .primary-nav --> made it @extend .navbar .navbar-default .navbar-fixed-top

21:02 <guardian> seemed to work

21:03 <guardian> but since I didn't have the time to triple check the generated css, I reverted to adding lots of classes to my haml

21:03 <guardian> but that's definitely an idea I want to push forward

21:03 <guardian> also, changing classes in layouts/default.haml isn't such a big deal

21:03 <guardian> but for items with table, I don't want items to contains CSS framework specific classes

21:04 <guardian> not to mention people who's going to be my users definitely don't care about bootstrap being used in the implementation <-- and that's a good thing

21:04 <guardian> sorry for the engrish

21:09 <ddfreyne> Hehe :)

21:10 <ddfreyne> I don't really know how to fix that properly :(

21:10 <ddfreyne> I was thinking of getting rid of bootstrap.

21:10 <guardian> well the problem is the same with every CSS framework

21:11 <guardian> you're obliged to use the CSS classes they require

21:11 <guardian> but really {:style="bordered"} will do it

22:29 <guardian> ddfreyne: https://gist.github.com/ddfreyne/3ed52d5e1437a8e64162#comment-1230186 works well for me