<travis-ci>
nanoc/nanoc/release-3.7.x e49afdf Denis Defreyne: The build passed.
<travis-ci>
nanoc/nanoc/master 01e0f37 Denis Defreyne: The build passed.
cDlm has quit [Quit: (null)]
alerante has joined #nanoc
alerante has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
cDlm has joined #nanoc
_whitelogger has joined #nanoc
<guardian>
ddfreyne: how's the pace on nanoc 4?
alerante has joined #nanoc
alerante has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<ddfreyne>
guardian: Slow
<ddfreyne>
guardian: The things I want to achieve are quite difficult. nanoc 4 might turn out to be quite different from nanoc 3
<ddfreyne>
guardian: It might also be a lot more restrictive too. For example, ERB/Haml/… might all go away, and instead I’d have a more restrictive templating language
alerante has joined #nanoc
alerante has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
alerante has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I’d e.g. restrict it to Mustache or something similar. Easier to use, equally powerful, and far easier to optimise for.
pkunc has joined #nanoc
<guardian>
ok
<guardian>
ddfreyne: I have the following concern: when item1 depends on item2[:foo], record the dependency on the attribute value, not the whole item
<guardian>
ddfreyne: since nanoc 4 is a long way, I would like to think about it for nanoc 3
<ddfreyne>
guardian: It's a big change and hard to fit in in nanoc 3