asheesh changed the topic of #sandstorm to: Welcome to #sandstorm: home of all things sandstorm.io. Say hi! | Channel glossary: "i,i" means "I have no point, I just want to say". b == thumbs up. | Public logs at https://botbot.me/freenode/sandstorm/ & http://logbot.g0v.tw/channel/sandstorm/today
joshbuddy has quit [Quit: joshbuddy]
ArcTanSusan has joined #sandstorm
isd has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
bb010g has joined #sandstorm
kecolus has quit [Quit: Leaving]
heliostatic has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
ArcTanSusan has quit [Quit: ArcTanSusan]
heliostatic has joined #sandstorm
ArcTanSusan has joined #sandstorm
rolig has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
rolig has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
rustyrazorblade has quit [Quit: rustyrazorblade]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
rolig has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
rolig has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.2]
tobald has joined #sandstorm
ArcTanSusan has quit [Quit: ArcTanSusan]
ecloud has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
ecloud has joined #sandstorm
au_ has joined #sandstorm
au has quit [Quit: leaving]
au has joined #sandstorm
pavar234 has joined #sandstorm
<pavar234> Hi guys. I have a basic question, but I am unable to figure that out. If I have a CAPNP struct with a list of integers: trunkIfaces @2: List(UInt64), how can elements be initialized? I was doing:
<pavar234> auto trunk = v.initTrunkIfaces(vlan->trunk_ifs.size());
<pavar234> and trunk[0] = 0x1ULL
<pavar234> and this does not work
<pavar234> [] operator for lists returns T::Builder for capnp List
<pavar234> but uint64_t::Builder seems not to exist, because trunk[0] is actually uint64_t
amyers has joined #sandstorm
<pavar234> Actually the type is
<pavar234> trunk.capnp::List<T, (capnp::Kind)0u>::Builder::operator[]<long unsigned int>(((capnp::uint)i))
<pavar234> thank you dwrensh
<pavar234> it had to be something stupid... sight
heliostatic has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
aaronr has joined #sandstorm
secher has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amyers has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amyers has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
heliostatic has joined #sandstorm
simonv3 has joined #sandstorm
zeroish has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Gmi has joined #sandstorm
Gmi has left #sandstorm [#sandstorm]
heliostatic has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
* asheesh waves, good morning.
bb010g has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
pavar234 has quit [Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client]
ArcTanSusan has joined #sandstorm
notevil has joined #sandstorm
heliostatic has joined #sandstorm
ArcTanSusan has quit [Quit: ArcTanSusan]
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
tobald has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
amyers has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amyers has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
mnutt has joined #sandstorm
<mnutt> asheesh: do you think sandstorm overlaps with nylug enough that I should change the meetup date?
<mnutt> I’m also going to send out an email to sandstorm-dev to ask if anyone in or near the area wants to give a talk, but wanted to get the date straightened out first, if it needs to be changed
<asheesh> Howdy mnutt
<mnutt> hello!
<asheesh> Well it's a question for you, I don't know, I'm kind of waffle-y. Mostly I see it as an arguably-fun way to borrow exposure from Let's Encrypt.
<asheesh> Also I can be in NYC on that day (Wed Jan 20).
<asheesh> (And Tue Jan 19 and Mon Jan 18 even)
<asheesh> Deciding that the first meetup is a small group thing to find out what people want to learn and do in the Meetup is a very good plan honestly.
<asheesh> Which would be a reason to have it be separate.
<asheesh> As for crossover, maybe you can have a join meetup at some point with NYLUG to benefit from the crossover.
<mnutt> yeah, that sounds really good. I like that, it takes some of the pressure off to have a great talk before figuring out what people hope to get out of it.
<asheesh> As for date conflict, I think it's not killer to have the Sandstorm meetup on the same day as NYLUG. If you didn't already have RSVPs I would suggest moving it to not conflict, but I think the cost of change is probably higher than the benefit.
<mnutt> there are 5 RSVPd at the moment
<asheesh> Ya
<asheesh> Maybe we/you can ask them if Tue would work instead. But I guess what I'm saying is, you're free to not do that too, there will always be future months.
<mnutt> ok, maybe we’ll leave the same date, and then at the meeting take a poll and see what works best for people
<asheesh> Yeah, awesome.
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<asheesh> And now I will RSVP yes!
<asheesh> (unless you don't want me!)
<asheesh> (in which case I'm fine doing something else) (I "have to" go to NYC that week anyway to see something at MOMA on Monday Jan 18 fwiw.)
<mnutt> no, we definitely want you there. the more the better.
<asheesh> (-:
<asheesh> K, great!
<asheesh> AFK briefly for lunch; will read scrollback
bb010g has joined #sandstorm
heliostatic has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
simonv3 has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
simonv3 has joined #sandstorm
heliostatic has joined #sandstorm
amyers has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
mnutt has quit [Quit: mnutt]
jadewang has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
joshbuddy has joined #sandstorm
heliostatic has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
jadewang has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mnutt has joined #sandstorm
mnutt has quit [Client Quit]
notevil has quit [Quit: +++ ATZ]
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
kecolus has joined #sandstorm
joshbuddy has quit [Quit: joshbuddy]
mnutt has joined #sandstorm
jadewang has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
joshbuddy has joined #sandstorm
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
<asheesh> Whoa
<asheesh> We should support this.
jadewang has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
|jemc| has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<asheesh> I don't think it is )-:
<asheesh> Oh, but maybe it is.
mnutt has quit [Quit: mnutt]
<asheesh> I will check in the near future.
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
<ocdtrekkie> asheesh : other than being another call for web apps over native (with Google's material branding all over it), does that page advocate any sort of new technology or capability?
jadewang has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<asheesh> I *think* that "Service Workers" <https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/11/app-shell> are relatively new, and that Sandstorm web app authors could use this to provide a mobile-app-esque experience to users of a grain.
jadewang has joined #sandstorm
<asheesh> The idea of "a music playing grain feels like a mobile app" is something I think my parents would appreciate, as they're in the market for a Sandstorm-based music player.
heliostatic has joined #sandstorm
jadewang has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
|jemc| has joined #sandstorm
jadewang has joined #sandstorm