whitequark changed the topic of #solvespace to: SolveSpace--parametric 2d/3d CAD · latest version 2.3 · http://solvespace.com · code at https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace · logs at https://irclog.whitequark.org/solvespace · message channel op if you can't talk
_whitelogger has joined #solvespace
dalias has joined #solvespace
<dalias> is there a way to fix having started a group in a wrong workplane?
<dalias> it's in the xy plane but i want it in a plane parallel to the xy plane but shifted away from it, i think
<dalias> (for extrusion not starting at 0)
_whitelogger has joined #solvespace
_whitelogger has joined #solvespace
cr1901_modern1 has joined #solvespace
cr1901_modern has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
cr1901_modern1 has quit [Client Quit]
cr1901_modern has joined #solvespace
fdedraco has joined #solvespace
<whitequark> unfortunately not
<whitequark> you could try editing the file (it's mostly plain text) but that voids your warranty
fdedraco has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<dalias> :)
<whitequark> oh, you're Rich Felker, right?
<dalias> yes
<dalias> i ended up just recreating it. (actually c&p, then restore constraints manually) but creating workplanes seems hard in general
<whitequark> unfortunately, yes
<dalias> i couldn't find a good way to make the necessary line segments and point for it
<dalias> best was to put some construction lines in the xy plane then make a new xz workplane to put a single point in, then use them...
<whitequark> oh
<whitequark> nonono, there's an easier way
<dalias> it would be nice if you could use axes rather than having to make gratuitous lines to define what plane you want it parallel to
<dalias> but i couldn't get that to work
<whitequark> there's been a patch that does this
<whitequark> we had to revert it because of compatibility issues
<whitequark> the file format is very baroque and needs to be completely redone
<whitequark> anyway
<whitequark> the special case of a workplane parallel to xy/xz/yz is easier
<whitequark> you make a point, then orient your viewport parallel to the axes you want
<whitequark> then make a workplane through that point (W)
<dalias> that's good to hear. i couldn't figure it out tho
<dalias> ah
<dalias> i didn't realize the "just using a point" thing depended on the view orientation
<dalias> that's why i got very weird results when i tried it
<whitequark> I *think* it's in the documentation
<dalias> i saw something about it (forget whether it was docs or a tutorial, i had a lot of tabs open)
<dalias> but i failed to understand it was the view axis
<dalias> if a workplane is made based on point/lines though, it's parametrized on them and movable via moving them, right? or are they just reduced to constants at creation time?
<whitequark> if it's based on points and lines it is movable.
<whitequark> if the lines ever become collinear this will cause numerical instability
<whitequark> so it's a good idea to constrain the lines perpendicular or at an angle
wpwrak has joined #solvespace
wpwrak has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
wpwrak has joined #solvespace