faustinoaq changed the topic of #amber to: Welcome to Amber Framework community! | https://amberframework.org | Developer happiness, productivity and bare metal performance | GH: https://github.com/amberframework | Docs: https://docs.amberframework.org | Gitter: https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber | IRC Logger: https://irclog.whitequark.org/amber | Amber::Server.start
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <lunarthegrey> > They also sent me a message privately, to which I responded -- they haven't donated anything yet, so I'm not going to just add their link to the github :\ ⏎ ⏎ PMed, unsure why it doesn't show up but I sent $8 (4 weeks worth). PMed you a screenshot.
<FromGitter> <damianham> > I understand commiting static assets, but why commit something that can be generated at any time using information that’s already present in the repo? ⏎ ⏎ yes good point, you could add public/dist/main.bundle.* to .gitignore (as long as your deployment process rebuilds the bundles)
raz has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
raz has joined #amber
raz has quit [Changing host]
raz has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <smadeja> I ended up adding public/dist to .gitignore, but don't you think it should be there by default? Another thing I've noticed is that generating a new app creates some bundles that get overwritten the first time I run 'bin/amber watch'
vivus has joined #amber
vivus has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Has anyone starting a pull request on the docs describing this new functionality yet?
<pracabor> @nsuchy I don't believe so
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> PR has more details
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> maybe I'll try a PR, could someone link me to a source on namespace and scopes in other languages so I can get an understanding of the concept
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> @nsuchy its basically a prefix
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5cf16281faac6439341a4293]
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> which would make the first get there like `/test/hello`
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> or `/test/test2/hello` for the inner most resource
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> vs having to repeat the same prefix over and over for related routes
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> oh I see
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> so I could have something like: ⏎ ⏎ ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5cf1794b702b7e5e76093d17]
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> essentially yea
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> nice
<FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> vs including `/blog/posts` on the two gets and post
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> that'll be cleaner
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> less error prone
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Think https://github.com/amberframework/amber/pull/1111 and then a new release put out tomorrow?
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Sorry that was unclear, can https://github.com/amberframework/amber/pull/1111 be merged and then a new release be put out tomorrow.
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Is there a way to pull amber from GitHub latest code rather than a tag?
<pracabor> you can specify branch: master in your shards.yml
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Could you show an example
<pracabor> however, installing it to your computer is more complicated, so your amber binary might be out of date and generate incorrect code
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> Perhaps an updator script
<FromGitter> <nsuchy> I use homebrew package manager on macOS so it could get complicated
<pracabor> what I mean is, within an Amber project which already exists on your machine, you can make it depend on the latest code
<pracabor> which means, for example, that you'd be able to use the namespace functionality discussed above
<pracabor> getting the amber binary on your machine updated to the latest code doesn't matter, and I wouldn't worry about doing that
_whitelogger has joined #amber