07:57 <kares[m]> enebo: should we wait with merging PRs on master, just in case there's a quick 9.2.9?

13:33 <enebo[m]> kares: I can branch from tag

13:34 <enebo[m]> kares: so no worries there

13:34 <kares[m]> okay I'll merge the uniq stuff so I can finish the enumerator pieces from there

13:45 <enebo[m]> kares: cool

13:47 <kares[m]> also planning some better testing with a Rails app

13:47 <kares[m]> think I'll just use the RG.org app since I had it running locally with JRuby

13:48 <kares[m]> I'd like to profile some and see if there's any low-hanging fruits ...

13:48 <kares[m]> left :)

14:01 <enebo[m]> kares: yeah keep notes on data population etc...

14:03 <kares[m]> maybe I'll try create a docker image, would that make sense?

14:03 <kares[m]> not sure how we would than compare running against MRI (another Docker)

14:04 <kares[m]> or if that complicates potential Java/JRuby profiling too much

14:04 <enebo[m]> yeah I don't know either

14:06 <kares[m]> guess I will have to try unless any Docker folks share their experience :)

15:07 <lopex> for me dockerized jruby with a sinatra app slows down somewhat

15:08 <lopex> not sure if it's more system calls or something

15:16 <travis-ci> jruby/jruby (master:9fb38a7 by Karol Bucek): The build was broken. https://travis-ci.org/jruby/jruby/builds/571864289 [230 min 34 sec]

16:32 <travis-ci> jruby/jruby (master:9fb38a7 by Karol Bucek): The build was broken. https://travis-ci.org/jruby/jruby/builds/571864289 [221 min 28 sec]

18:20 <enebo[m]> kares: lopex Thinking about this a bit more it would make sense to have both an MRI and JRuby docker image for something like rb.org benching. It may not be "real" but it should give some comparative numbers

18:21 <enebo[m]> It could be the JVM or MRI does more syscalls or something which is slower on docker but it would be very handy for us all to be able to just run stuff on perf changes

22:43 <cpuguy83> @lopex Hey! I wanted to touch base with you regarding the Docker image.