01:28 <ruralhack> I just upgraded my computer, what's the best version of ruby to use with nanoc right now.

01:29 <ruralhack> ?*

01:29 <ruralhack> to work with all the gems like haml and foundation?

01:32 <ruralhack> I don't want to go to the edge. what version of ruby encapsulates nanoc best?

01:45 <ruralhack> 2.1.2?

01:45 <bobthecow> ruralhack: it works great with anything 1.9+

01:46 <bobthecow> but use 2.1.x

01:46 <ruralhack> thanks bob, been away for awhile.

02:06 <ruralhack> is java a virus like microsoft?

11:12 <guardian> o/

11:12 <guardian> ddfreyne: I'm facing again WARN: Unresolved specs during Gem::Specification.reset: │46 HTTP/1.1" 200 58688

11:12 <guardian> cri (~> 2.3)

11:12 <guardian> ddfreyne: this is because I have both cri 2.6.1 and 2.6.1 installed

11:12 <guardian> ddfreyne: launching without bundle exec gives the warning

11:13 <guardian> ddfreyne: lauching with bundle exec doesn't

11:13 <guardian> ddfreyne: not sure there's something to do beside bundle exec OR gem cleanup so that there's a single version of cri installed

11:19 <guardian> ddfreyne: I'm not sure checksummer properly fixes #310 as advertized. I'm investigating atm

11:41 <guardian> ddfreyne: and I can't use my https://gist.github.com/gpakosz/5420177 hack anymore with Compass 1.0 alpha :(

20:59 <ddfreyne> guardian: The unresolved spec thing is weird :(

21:00 <ddfreyne> guardian: Why does #431 not properly fix #310?

21:00 <ddfreyne> Did you figure out?

21:00 <ddfreyne> (Sorry, been swamped in other things atm)

21:01 <ddfreyne> I need to release 3.7.1 :(