ddfreyne changed the topic of #nanoc to: 3.7.4 (November 23rd) | web http://nanoc.ws/ | repo http://bit.ly/XE6e3G | issues http://bit.ly/VfXaSV | forum http://ho.io/n-discuss | irclog http://irclog.whitequark.org/nanoc
srbaker has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in]
drops has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne> Can I get a +1 on https://github.com/nanoc/nanoc/pull/504 ?
drops has quit [Quit: drops]
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne created remove-1.8.x-support (+1 new commit): http://git.io/98JoGw
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 61b37bd Denis Defreyne: Require Ruby >= 1.9.3
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to remove-1.8.x-support: http://git.io/oMyAMQ
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 2dfc05e Denis Defreyne: Remove 1.8.x compatibility hacks
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to remove-1.8.x-support: http://git.io/YnxL8w
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 3a8381e Denis Defreyne: Remove 1.8.7 from Travis CI config
<travis-ci> nanoc/nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 61b37bd Denis Defreyne: The build failed.
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 2 new commits to remove-1.8.x-support: http://git.io/ThwqRQ
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 8b3242c Denis Defreyne: Use 1.9.x hash style
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 19ace86 Denis Defreyne: Use &:sym style when appropriate
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to remove-1.8.x-support: http://git.io/uJoFHA
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 6517f6d Denis Defreyne: Use -> instead of lambda
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne force-pushed remove-1.8.x-support from 6517f6d to 7a29764: http://git.io/SNyfzQ
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 7a29764 Denis Defreyne: Use Ruby 1.9.x style
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to remove-1.8.x-support: http://git.io/PHdVGw
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 6867626 Denis Defreyne: Simplify Gemfile
<travis-ci> nanoc/nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support 6867626 Denis Defreyne: The build was fixed.
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to release-3.7.x: http://git.io/WBkfZQ
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/release-3.7.x bfd9fa4 Denis Defreyne: Merge pull request #517 from nanoc/remove-1.8.x-support...
<travis-ci> nanoc/nanoc/release-3.7.x bfd9fa4 Denis Defreyne: The build passed.
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/UAJsSA
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/master 04524d7 Denis Defreyne: Merge branch 'release-3.7.x'...
<travis-ci> nanoc/nanoc/master 04524d7 Denis Defreyne: The build passed.
<nanoc-gh> [nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 1 new commit to release-notes-for-3.7.5: http://git.io/YXIs5w
<nanoc-gh> nanoc/release-notes-for-3.7.5 1a54330 Denis Defreyne: Add #502 and #517
<travis-ci> nanoc/nanoc/release-notes-for-3.7.5 1a54330 Denis Defreyne: The build passed.
<tom[]> ddfreyne: why is nanoc in the linting business?
<dkm> bobthecow: yeah, I've tried disqus, it's fine but I'd like something I could install on my own so I always know where my data is :)
<dkm> ugh, "data are"
<tom[]> dkm: i feel for you. dusqus is like using gmail, convenient but now you don't even own your email
<bobthecow> tom[]: the flip side is, it's a huge pain to own your email :)
<tom[]> bobthecow: i have no problem with it
<tom[]> i don't run my own servers. i pay a service provider that a) isn't an advertizing company and b) doesn't have a lopsided tos
<bobthecow> that doesn't mean it's not a pain, just that you've chosen to take on that pain because you value owning your email more than you value whatever amount of hassle it is to own a mail server.
<tom[]> it's not a pain at all
<bobthecow> ohhh. you meant something different by "own your email" than i did.
<bobthecow> carry on :)
<tom[]> google's tos means they own your email
<bobthecow> well. not quite. they have a license to your email.
<bobthecow> that's not exactly the same.
<tom[]> if they choose to close your account, keep your mail and deny you any further access, that's within their rights
<tom[]> and they actually do this
<tom[]> that's what i mean by own
<bobthecow> all my email goes to two places, but the other place it goes is a pain.
<tom[]> i am aware that my objection is nearly meaningless because everyone else in the world uses gmail, so google gets all my email too
<bobthecow> yep :)
<tom[]> if most people put convenience abobe all else, i can be private only by keeping quiet
<dkm> bobthecow: tom[] there certainly is a traid off, but yes, I value my data ownership over the convenience of letting a third party store it, at least for comments, I haven't been able to ween myself from gmail yet
<dkm> but comments are a litte different, it's not *just* my data, it's authored by others too, and I want to be able to tell anyone who wants to leave a comment exactly how that data will be used and stored
<tom[]> and don't forget about the risks of letting other people put content on your web site
<tom[]> when we did it, we started with a pretty harsh disclaimer of responsibility for such content
<dkm> oh yeah, and so that's part of why I was asking what other people were doign, how are people handeling moderating?
<dkm> and spam
<tom[]> dkm: take a look at http://spinitron.com/kspc click log on to join the chat
<tom[]> you just need to choose a nick and solve the captcha
<tom[]> it's time i stopped using google for the captcha
<tom[]> the radio show host is moderator. she has the option to pre-screen messages or not. she can delete messages after they are published. she also has "panic room" controls to delete all messages and/or turn off chat
<tom[]> and the public chat user session lasts as long as the radio show is on air
srbaker has joined #nanoc
FabianB_ has joined #nanoc
FabianB has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
pkunc has joined #nanoc