ddfreyne changed the topic of #nanoc to: 3.7.5 (January 12th) | web http://nanoc.ws/ | repo http://bit.ly/XE6e3G | issues http://bit.ly/VfXaSV | forum http://ho.io/n-discuss | irclog http://irclog.whitequark.org/nanoc
FabianB has joined #nanoc
FabianB is now known as Guest67766
Guest18550 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Guest67766 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
FabianB has joined #nanoc
FabianB is now known as Guest91346
cDlm has joined #nanoc
jugglinmike has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
cDlm has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
jaspervdj has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Guest91346 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
FabianB has joined #nanoc
jaspervdj has joined #nanoc
FabianB is now known as Guest45736
VitamineD has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
jugglinmike1 has joined #nanoc
jugglinmike has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jugglinmike has joined #nanoc
jugglinmike1 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<tom[]> does the nanoc command provide a way to force update of all output? or should i instead delete the output and then run nanoc?
antognolli has left #nanoc [#nanoc]
<VitamineD> tom[]: there's nanoc compile --force but it's only here for backwards compatibility, apparently
<tom[]> backwards compatibility killed the cat
<tom[]> ok, thanks VitamineD
<ddfreyne> tom[]: rm -rf tmp will do the trick
jugglinmike1 has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne> https://twitter.com/qrush/status/592756008616906755 <- I suppose I can’t retweet that, because I’m biased towards Jekyll, right? :)
jugglinmike has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<ddfreyne> Also, I haven’t had as much success at releasing nanoc 3.8 and cri 2.whatever as I would like :(
<ddfreyne> But they’ll be out this week. No promises though :P
<ddfreyne> bobthecow: Congrats on Presentate joining Dropbox!
jugglinmike1 is now known as jugglinmike
<bobthecow> ddfreyne: thanks!
VitamineD has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
VitamineD has joined #nanoc