00:41 <d_bot> <sip> why are the bots talking?

00:42 <companion_cube> the IRC bridge?

00:44 <d_bot> <sip> that's against tos

00:45 <d_bot> <sip> if it allows you to sign in with your cookie you should do that instead

00:49 <companion_cube> -_-

00:49 <companion_cube> I'm not a bot, this is the IRC <-> discord bridge

00:51 <d_bot> <sip> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/436568060288172044/842927114336206878/unknown.png

00:52 <d_bot> <sip> https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002192352-Automated-user-accounts-self-bots-

00:55 <companion_cube> ffs

00:56 <companion_cube> @sip please read the topic

00:56 <companion_cube> as in "bridged to IRC" and stuff

01:07 <d_bot> <sip> that bridge works by using a bot account to communicate

01:09 <d_bot> <sip> i'm not trying to be an asshole

01:09 <waleee-cl> ... you really thought there was 200 bots in a channel?

01:09 <waleee-cl> or room, or whatever the discord terminology is

01:10 <waleee-cl> (200 = current number of users, including the discord-bridge bot)

01:12 <d_bot> <sip> yes, how else would the bridge work? you need to use the api

01:14 <waleee-cl> your first comment, "why are the bots talking?" did imply that you didn't know that

03:59 <d_bot> <darrenldl> isnt that tos just against programming normal human accounts?

04:44 <d_bot> <Yugami> the page you linked says that self-bot are prohibited, for what I know the IRC do not use self-bot.

04:45 <d_bot> <Yugami> otherwise they wouldn't be "tagged" as bot

13:18 <d_bot> <qubit1> Hi, does anyone know of the approximate date of OCaml 4.13 release?

13:21 <SoF> https://i.imgur.com/IOEOcWo.png

13:39 <d_bot> <octachron> @qubit1 : 24 February + 6 month = 24 August, 24 August + summer holidays ≃ Late September

13:53 <d_bot> <qubit1> Ok, thanks!

16:08 <d_bot> <stab> Using arbitrary length integers will be a big performance hit compared to say a bitvector right? Trying to implement this paper http://www.es.mdh.se/pdf_publications/3813.pdf and it handles bit widths by using arbitrary length integers then bringing stuff back into the bitwidth domain with mod 2w. The one implementation ive seen for this is using bitvectors which just seems off to me tbh

16:11 <d_bot> <stab> infact their docs pretty much say they arent doing canonization correctly since they state "Its actual cardinality could be less since the CLP may overlap itself" which is specifically what canonization is built to avoid. The simplest solution here would just be to use big int, just wondering how bad that is gonna be on performance

16:55 <ghosthell> Non-Terrestrial or Terrestrial beings Which have Access to Trans-Un1versal Transp0rtation Please PM me*%