12:58 <beneroth> Regenaxer, there is no (sect) or (diff) for pilog, right? The advise is to use lisp, not picolisp, when doing queries like "find all objects with list-property containing this list-of-values" ?

12:59 <Regenaxer> yes, no direct (sect) or (diff)

13:00 <Regenaxer> But for DB searches not efficient anyway

13:00 <Regenaxer> better filter during fetching

13:00 <Regenaxer> ah

13:00 <Regenaxer> sorry, misread

13:00 <Regenaxer> there is 'member' in pilog

13:00 <beneroth> I do now (for P ParameterList (iter (tree 'foo '+Class) Prg P P))

13:01 <beneroth> yes, but member is only "is atom in list", not is "list contained in list"

13:01 <Regenaxer> yep

13:01 <beneroth> well, basically set comparison :)

13:01 <Regenaxer> T

13:01 <beneroth> so my iter above is perfect?

13:02 <Regenaxer> You could write a predicate similar to member/2, but lisp calls are faster

13:02 <beneroth> I see

13:03 <Regenaxer> the iter looks good, if Prg is a function

13:05 <Regenaxer> So at least the variable name is misleading

13:06 <beneroth> T

13:22 <beneroth> bbl

19:25 <beneroth> bbl