bendiken changed the topic of #ruby-rdf to: Ruby RDF & SPARQL chat. | https://github.com/ruby-rdf/rdf | Gitter: https://gitter.im/ruby-rdf/rdf | Mailing List: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-ruby | Twitter: @Gkellogg @bendiken @no_reply | Use http://pastebin.com for code/graph snippets. Also join #swig for general linked data and semantic web chatter. Public channel log at http://irclog.whitequark.org/ruby-rdf/
gkellogg_ has quit [Quit: gkellogg_]
gkellogg_ has joined #ruby-rdf
gkellogg_ has quit [Client Quit]
gkellogg has quit [Quit: gkellogg]
gkellogg has joined #ruby-rdf
gkellogg has quit [Quit: gkellogg]
tjohnson has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
gkellogg has joined #ruby-rdf
_whitelogger has joined #ruby-rdf
gkellogg has quit [Quit: gkellogg]
tjohnson has joined #ruby-rdf
<tjohnson> j0llyr0tten: yeah, it could be nicer; but it's largely just a tradeoff of dynamic typing/multiple inheritance, I think.
<tjohnson> e.g. it's possible that a `method_missing` def in a subclass doesn't actually change the methods responded to (rather changing their behavior) from the superclass.
<tjohnson> not sure what level of static analysis is possible/practical for this.
gkellogg has joined #ruby-rdf