00:45 <purr\Paws> [Issues] devyn comment on issue #18: I like the idea of using a single-consumption SSA type thing. Perhaps we can still have coproduction if we do something like this? (Excuse the horrible syntax.)... https://github.com/Paws/Issues/issues/18#issuecomment-53137715

03:18 <purr\Paws> [Issues] ELLIOTTCABLE comment on issue #18: @devyn (note, first, that #16 is unrelated to this (except, perhaps, in that they'll need different namespaces of some sort, I suppose.) That's to do with an SSA form for describing dependencies in an instruction graph (that has nothing to do with semantics; it's explicitly syntactic); this is about *naming* nodes in that graph, with semantic purposes.)... https://github.com/Paws/Issues/issue