faustinoaq changed the topic of #amber to: Welcome to Amber Framework community! | https://amberframework.org | Developer happiness, productivity and bare metal performance | GH: https://github.com/amberframework | Docs: https://docs.amberframework.org | Gitter: https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber | IRC Logger: https://irclog.whitequark.org/amber | Amber::Server.start
_whitelogger has joined #amber
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> the SEO of just amber is technically worse since amber is a common name and a common gemstone
<FromGitter> <proyb6> I like to be straightforward in my opinion, I would say, change name, colour and logo. ⏎ Amber - Too common, like Sam explained and it's also a person name, colour, or many meanings. Prefer a unique technology name. ⏎ Colour - Blue, Purple, Black, etc, Black being the wording are professional as we know. ⏎ Logo - Gemstone shape is not everyone liking, I understand Amber means confidence and safety but I prefer
<FromGitter> ... powerful and cutting edge so that devs who are risk takers will love to try it. ⏎ ... [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5c21ecdb93cce97d3b947ee0]
feepbot has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
feepbot has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> honestly I think an old school well done gloss effect logo might actually be the way to go here, to get that sharp professional look e.g. this style (but better execution and different shape): http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/2786230/314366681/stock-vector-vector-amber-illustration-petrous-resin-for-design-vector-amber-illustration-isolate-on-a-white-314366681.jpg
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> kemalyst had a better logo imo -- I miss that
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> it also sucks that lucky's home page design is so sexy
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> orange is hard to design with if the year isn't 2008 and you can't use gloss effect on everything, so it should basically be a subtle accent color or only used in the logo. definitely no orange headers or titlebars etc
<FromGitter> <drujensen> @sam0x17 thanks for the feedback. why does it suck that lucky’s homepage is sexy? I would think that’s a good thing.
<FromGitter> <drujensen> @proyb6 thanks for the feedback. I don’t think I have the time or willpower for another redesign. If you guys want to take a stab at it though, contributions are welcome.
<FromGitter> <Willyboar> Well lucky has thoughtbot style.
<FromGitter> <Willyboar> Amber needs his own style, but I have to agree that it needs a catchy landing page
<FromGitter> <proyb6> I like to hear other's feedback for who have used Amber to see if anything could be useful to revamp if anyone including me could work on it
<FromGitter> <Willyboar> IMHO amber is better than lucky for a rails new comer.
feepbot has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
feepbot has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <sam0x17> agreed ^