<FromGitter>
<proyb6> @vlazar I have once test 8 or 12 process
<FromGitter>
<proyb6> ...on 4 cores CPU which seem to give a bit more throughpu
<FromGitter>
<proyb6> @drujensen It's awesome if it help
_whitelogger has joined #amber
_whitelogger has joined #amber
snsei has joined #amber
snsei has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
snsei has joined #amber
snsei has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<FromGitter>
<vlazar> @drujensen The linked results are from recent "nightly" runs. I believe only Round N results are checked thoroughly for possible errors so maybe wait for Round 18?
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter>
<vlazar> @proyb6 Thank you. Yeah, I don't expect best Go's DB pool settings to map directly to Crystal. We need to find a good balance between throughput/latency. Having benchmark results for different DB pool limits would be useful info anyway so everyone could optimize for what's more important to them.
<FromGitter>
<jamesreckon> I have come up a new idea about getting Crystal demo in one place to encourage newbies and experience developers to try any Crystal code in repo without friction or having to search everywhere. Hence, I like to encourage Crystal folks to contribute your code demo to showcase any features which can be related to your or other author’s shards: ⏎ ⏎ https://github.com/jamesreckon/Crystal-Code-Showcase-2018
<FromGitter>
<drujensen> Hi James. That sounds like a good idea.
snsei has joined #amber
snsei has quit [Remote host closed the connection]