14:56 <t1|Mike> Hi! Is it possible to add a custom macro to Granite without forking and modifying it? (I don't mind making a custom fork for my needs if that is the only way)

14:56 <t1|Mike> If my question is better somewhere else please let me know

14:57 <t1|Mike> I ask because a few of my models need the same contact fields (email, phone, IM handles)

15:00 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> similar to `timestamps`?

15:09 <t1|Mike> Yep, exactly

15:10 <t1|Mike> It may better handled as a linked table, now I think about it

15:16 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> can still define your own macro and have it just plop down the `field email : String` stuff

15:17 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> thats all the `timestamps` one does

15:38 <FromGitter> <proyb6> @vlazar From what I seen in Go code, it's number of CPU multiply by 4 seem excessive for database, perhaps worth a try on Crystal Postgres ⏎ https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/master/frameworks/Go/fasthttp/src/server-postgresql/server.go#L28

18:53 <FromGitter> <vlazar> Thanks @proyb6 Yeah, I've checked Go's and others settings with DB pool. When I first made change from 256 to 8 in single implementation I wanted to see results both on Citrine and Azure. Then I realized other implementations in Crystal are getting errors, so results for them are probably not real anyways. So I've changed them too. Still want to check Azure results with 8 before next change. BTW do you mean trying DB 4

18:53 <FromGitter> ... connections per Crystal process? Go is single process so its like 14 * 4 = 56 connections for DB pool. Crystal should be running 14 processes and using 8 connections per process. But then latency dropped on multiple requests compared to previous 256 limit for DB pool size. For better latency it looks like we need ... [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5bf99e2ab6c0701052800b02]

23:42 <FromGitter> <drujensen> @vlazar @proyb6 the latest benchmarks are awesome! Super happy to see that. Should we use that link instead?