10:18 <medfly> Hi, I'm tinkering with some examples and kinda surprised at the state of buildbot-slave - I seem to be doing python3 support patches. am I looking at the wrong thing?

10:18 <medfly> With: https://pypi.org/project/buildbot-slave/

10:19 <felixfontein> buildbot-slave is dead. use https://pypi.org/project/buildbot-worker/ instead.

10:19 <medfly> thanks!

10:20 <felixfontein> I don't know who has access to the buildbot-slave PyPi project, but someone should mark it as deprecated / replaced

10:21 <cmouse> tardyp might know

10:21 <medfly> wow, hi cmouse!

10:21 <cmouse> hi

10:21 <cmouse> =)

10:21 <medfly> we used to chat in the same channel on quakenet!

10:21 <cmouse> yes

10:29 <tardyp> the problem is that changing that means uploading a new package version

10:40 <tardyp> I hacked this https://pypi.org/project/buildbot-slave/0.8.14.post1/

10:40 <tardyp> hopefully won't brake anybody's setup

10:41 <medfly> thanks

10:42 <cmouse> tardyp: people can affix the version if they insist on running ages old version

10:43 <tardyp> its just that I hope this version is functional. I just extracted the tarbal, and changed the description and re compressed it

10:43 <tardyp> running setup.py sdist do not work anymore :/

10:44 <cmouse> good point, on the other hand, it has been there for a while, so if that's the only change i'm sure people are prepared.

18:00 <mscastanho> Hi, I'm trying to create a setup where I have a single builder (with a Trigger step) trigger several other Triggerable schedulers depending on the files changed in the last set of incoming changes (that triggered the first build). Right now I'm using a subclass of Trigger to override getSchedulersAndProperties, but I suspect I don't have access to the set of changed files inside the Trigger step,

18:00 <mscastanho> which I would need to check to decide which schedulers to trigger. Is my suspicion correct? Do you see another way to accomplish this?

18:06 <cmouse> the actual change should be available.

18:06 <cmouse> i think it'll be under source stamp maybe?

19:33 <mscastanho> cmouse: you're right. I think I was trying to access it the wrong way. Thanks!