ChanServ changed the topic of #linux-rockchip to: Rockchip development discussion | Wiki at http://linux-rockchip.info | Logs at http://irclog.whitequark.org/linux-rockchip | ML at http://groups.google.com/group/linux-rockchip
nighty has joined #linux-rockchip
nighty has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nighty has joined #linux-rockchip
cnxsoft has joined #linux-rockchip
matthias_bgg has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
matthias_bgg has joined #linux-rockchip
GTRsdk has joined #linux-rockchip
GTRsdk has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
aalm has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
jkstrick_ has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
vagrantc has quit [Quit: leaving]
premoboss has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick_ has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
premoboss has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
nighty has quit [Quit: Disappears in a puff of smoke]
npl has joined #linux-rockchip
<npl> Hoi
<npl> Really weird question, I get max CPU Speed 1608MHz for Firefly RK3288. Is this a known issue?
<npl> Both Kernel 4.7.2 and 4.8rc2 show this. I found some reference to SAFETY_FREQ on the web
<mmind00> npl: why is that wired? The generic operating points in rk3288 do end at that frequency
<npl> It should be 1800, or not? Its advertised as such at least
<mmind00> npl: they were specified as safe for all use cases ... so everything else would be on a per-board basis
<mmind00> npl: i.e. Chromebooks do go higher (not yet in mainline devicetrees), but of course were extensively tested to not overheat there
paulk-nyan-big has joined #linux-rockchip
<npl> I had my Board overheating and continously rebooting just yesterday, but the Firefly Board is advertised as "up to 1,8Ghz"
<npl> Im just doing some performance test for work, so these details matter at the moment =)
<npl> BTW. is there a way for mere mortals to get an RK3399 evalboard?
<npl> I take that the current kernel or dts is capped as 1608 for rk3288. Can live with that, just was really sure it was 1800 just a day ago =)
<npl> Just another question: thermal throttling seems to be independent of the cpufreq govenor? I had some drops to 1Ghz during benchmarks
nighty has joined #linux-rockchip
paulk-nyan-big has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
paulk-nyan-big has joined #linux-rockchip
paulk-nyan-big has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<mmind00> npl: thermal throttling is tied into cpufreq, so when heat-levels are reached the max frequency gets capped
<mmind00> npl: the rk3399evbis not on sale
<mmind00> npl: and yes the rk3288 can reach these 1.8Ghz, but especially on devboards without any heat-management the chip can get quite hot
<npl> Yeah, not just the chip.. the entire platine was hot =)
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
cnxsoft has quit [Quit: cnxsoft]
afaerber has joined #linux-rockchip
afaerber has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
afaerber has joined #linux-rockchip
premoboss has joined #linux-rockchip
premoboss has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
npl has quit [Quit: Page closed]
sunilmohan has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
sunilmohan has joined #linux-rockchip
sunilmohan has quit [Changing host]
sunilmohan has joined #linux-rockchip
vagrantc has joined #linux-rockchip
fischerm has joined #linux-rockchip
<vagrantc> well, u-boot v2016.09-rc2 fixed my issues with firefly-rk3288 ... yay.
<vagrantc> still having troubles with veyron-speedy chromebook where the eMMC is detected maybe once out of every 10 boots
<vagrantc> curious how the boot commandline option rockchip.usb_uart is used ... the documentation i've found in the kernel and searching online is pretty sparse
* vagrantc really wonders about getting u-boot on this instead of depthcharge
matthias_bgg has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<karlp> depthcharge?
<vagrantc> karlp: it's a bootloader used on chromebooks
<vagrantc> for one thing, depthcharge doesn't appear to have any way to specify alternate boot configurations at boot... which makes debugging ... interesting.
<karlp> sounds like a pretty deliberate attempt at killing uboot :)
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
vagrantc has quit [Quit: leaving]
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
afaerber has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
aalm has joined #linux-rockchip
vagrantc has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
aalm has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
paulk-collins has joined #linux-rockchip
aalm has joined #linux-rockchip
aalm has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
afaerber has joined #linux-rockchip
jkstrick has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jkstrick has joined #linux-rockchip
fireglow has quit [Quit: Gnothi seauton; Veritas vos liberabit]
fireglow has joined #linux-rockchip
<vagrantc> well, seemed to have figured out the eMMC issue on veyron-speedy ... basically needs the same patch applied for minnie: 984926781122f034d5bc9962815d135b6c4a8e1d ARM: dts: rockchip: temporarily remove emmc hs200 speed from rk3288 minnie
VargaD has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
VargaD has joined #linux-rockchip
<mmind00> vagrantc: what do you need regarding rockchip.usb_uart? The rk3288 can use one of the usb ports (the otg one) to route uart signals to it
<mmind00> vagrantc: i.e. you'd get raw uart signals on the usb pins
aalm has joined #linux-rockchip
paulk-collins has quit [Quit: Leaving]
nighty has quit [Remote host closed the connection]