koan has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
koan has joined #nanoc
jadd_ has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
jadd_ has joined #nanoc
jadd_ has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
jadd_ has joined #nanoc
telemachus has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
telemachus has joined #nanoc
el-cuco has joined #nanoc
el-cuco has quit [Client Quit]
pavelkunc has joined #nanoc
kitallis has joined #nanoc
kitallis has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
bghost has quit [Quit: leaving]
bghost has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Changing host]
bghost has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Client Quit]
kitallis has joined #nanoc
bghost has joined #nanoc
yogsototh has joined #nanoc
yogsototh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
yogsototh has joined #nanoc
jadd_ has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
blue_pearl has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Quit: leaving]
<blue_pearl>
when i put an image in markdown file and then compile with nanoc , the output does not show image in html…here is my markdown code 
bghost has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Changing host]
bghost has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Quit: leaving]
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: Is the path to your image correct?
<darix>
blue_pearl: and how does the resulting html look like?
<darix>
and which markdown processor?
<blue_pearl>
yes the image link is correct...
<blue_pearl>
the output html does not change the code while doing it in nano , it stays as 
<blue_pearl>
but if i open the markdown file with my markdown editor and convert it to html then the output is <img src="….."> and image is gown in browser
<darix>
which markdown processor are you using?
<blue_pearl>
i am using Mou markdown editor.
<darix>
in nanoc
<blue_pearl>
kramdown
<blue_pearl>
installed via gem
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: Hmmm… is the rest of the markdown document converted properly?
<darix>
ddfreyne: how to force a certain markdown processor?
<blue_pearl>
ddfreyne, i guess so, it works fine expect the image part.
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: Does the path to your image contain spaces or somesuch? That might cause it to trip up…
<ddfreyne>
darix: heh :) Who leaves their account logged in anyway
<darix>
ddfreyne: see the title attribute of the image ;)
<ddfreyne>
yep
<ddfreyne>
I now have different passwords for everything. One base password and one fairly simple hash function I keep in memory, and that is how I generate different passwords for everything
<blue_pearl>
ddfreyne, nope no spaces.
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: Does it work with bluecloth, rdiscount, …?
<blue_pearl>
Its working now…restarted the server.
<blue_pearl>
i feel so dumb ! :)
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: what server?
<darix>
ddfreyne: loxodo/passwordsafe with a very long password and normal lenght passwords for all the services.
<blue_pearl>
ddfreyne, locathost
<ddfreyne>
darix: One of the reasons why I’m not inclined to use password managers is because I’m afraid what will happen if I lose the password store
<ddfreyne>
darix: Which *should* not happen, but you never know
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: autocompile? watch?
<blue_pearl>
ddfreyne, adsf
<ddfreyne>
blue_pearl: Ahh… hm, might have been a caching issue. What browser are you using?
<darix>
ddfreyne: ETOOMANYPASSWORDS and not all are controlled by me
<guardian>
what's best for the receiver? gittip or pledgie or else?
jadd_ has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne>
I really wouldn’t know :(
bghost has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
jadd_ has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
jadd_ has joined #nanoc
botton has joined #nanoc
botton has left #nanoc [#nanoc]
botton has joined #nanoc
botton has left #nanoc [#nanoc]
superkulak has joined #nanoc
vy has joined #nanoc
yogsototh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bghost has joined #nanoc
bghost has quit [Changing host]
bghost has joined #nanoc
<vy>
In content directory, I have files like foo.jpg and foo.private.xcf. I want .private.* files to be exclude while compiling, hence I wrote a preprocess code modifying "items" variable. But "nanoc co" complains that RuntimeError: Found 2 content files for content/foo; expected 0 or 1. Any ideas?
<darix>
vy: so you removed everything with private from the ItemsArray?
<vy>
darix: It somehow, IMHO, does not even reach that line.
<darix>
ddfreyne: is the check for duplicate items run on the stuff after preprocessing?
<ddfreyne>
darix: I believe it is run before
<darix>
ddfreyne: hmhm
<guardian>
uh oh
<guardian>
why did I upgrade: /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/nanoc-3.6.2/lib/nanoc/base/core_ext/array.rb:65: warning: Nanoc::Extra::FileProxy#respond_to?(:marshal_dump) is old fashion which takes only one parameter
<guardian>
I mean brew upgrade :/
<darix>
guardian: but now you are a hipster with ruby 2.0!
<guardian>
s/hipster/fucked
<ddfreyne>
guardian: nanoc should work fine with 2.0.0
<guardian>
ddfreyne: well it spills tons of those :)
<ddfreyne>
that exact warning?
<ddfreyne>
weird
<guardian>
that exact warning
jadd_ has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
jadd_ has joined #nanoc
<superkulak>
Hey guys, I'm new to nanoc and I'm trying to use the static data source
<superkulak>
but when I compile, nanoc puts the files contained within the static folder into the output folder appending the extension to each file, so that I end up with "file.ext.ext" instead of "file.ext"
<superkulak>
I'm not using any rules for those files, just added "type: static" under "data_sources" in nanoc.yaml
<superkulak>
suggestions?
<darix>
why do you need that at all?
<superkulak>
web fonts with the same name but different extensions
<guardian>
superkulak: in the meantime, you have to define a rule for those items coming from the static data source
FunkyPenguin has joined #nanoc
<superkulak>
mhm, I think I tried that yet
bghost has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
vy has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
<guardian>
ddfreyne: so what do we do with those file_proxy warnings? :)
<ddfreyne>
superkulak: That happens because you have a routing rule that matches /static/* and appends the extension (twice)
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I’ll check it out
<superkulak>
ddfreyne: I removed it yesterday :) maybe It's in some other file that I'm too noob to know?
<ddfreyne>
superkulak: Do you have something + item[:extension] in your routes somewhere?
<superkulak>
ops, yes, when it checks for binary files
<superkulak>
at the end of the Rules file
<superkulak>
but if I remove it, nanoc will mess with binary files in my content folder, right? So I guess I should avoid to put binaries in that folder
<superkulak>
and this is not an elegant solution, I think