18:02 <ddfreyne> !twitter http://twitter.com/emaadmanzoor/status/344091392533999617

18:02 <number-six> @emaadmanzoor: Running a Nanoc blog is a big distraction from writing. My last few attempts derailed into writing a LaTeX filter and adding hosted search.

18:02 <ddfreyne> That is a disadvantage... :D

18:09 <gkarekinian> It's like when I stopped posting for months because I was using Octopress master and was too lazy to fix it when everything broke :)

18:11 <gkarekinian> The good part is I spent a lot of time writing code and sending pull requests

18:14 <ddfreyne> nanoc 4.0 is going to break a lot of stuff too :)

18:14 <ddfreyne> Hm speaking of nanoc 4.0, I should update my "experimental" branch of the stoneship site to use it

18:14 <ddfreyne> ah already done

18:15 <ddfreyne> I think I just got the most horrifying crash eever

18:15 <ddfreyne> -e

18:16 <gkarekinian> I'll probably update my one page website to run nanoc 4.0

18:17 <gkarekinian> It's not like a blog where I need to post new content frequently

18:17 <ddfreyne> https://gist.github.com/ddfreyne/5750975/raw/82be91b840ea3def98e8d57dd9e9f270f69ccad1/gistfile1.txt

18:18 <ddfreyne> fixed

18:19 <gkarekinian> That's a big ass stacktrace alright

18:19 <ddfreyne> Now it says

18:20 <ddfreyne> RuntimeError: Cannot create a link to <Nanoc::Item* identifier="/index.erb"> because this target is not outputted (its routing rule returns nil)

18:20 <ddfreyne> Better, but not ideal, because it mentions routing rules which do not exist any longer :D

18:20 <ddfreyne> NoMethodError: undefined method `route' for #<Nanoc::CompilerDSL:0x007fc0e1185b10>

18:20 <gkarekinian> "outputted" sounds really wrong :)

18:21 <ddfreyne> Yeah...