Humpelstilzchen has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Humpelstilzchen has joined #neo900
wpwrak has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
wpwrak has joined #neo900
jonwil has joined #neo900
jonwil has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.91.1 [SeaMonkey 2.33.1/20150321194901]]
ashneo76 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
Pali has joined #neo900
sparetire has quit [Quit: sparetire]
<Wizzup>
Of course, all that could also overlap with maemo work in general
<DocScrutinizer05>
it does
modem has joined #neo900
ashneo76 has joined #neo900
<Wizzup>
DocScrutinizer05: but how would you envision upgrading some more essential parts (like crypto libs), even if everything was open? just keep both old and new installed?
<Wizzup>
A more radical example would be glibc of course
<Wizzup>
(note: if this kind of things are already discussed/documented I'd be happy to read up)
<Wizzup>
I vaguely bringing it up before, but I'm not active enough (lack of time unfortunately - should be better in some months) to have fully kept up
<DocScrutinizer05>
please discuss all this in #maemo-ssu since it seems to be highly on topic there and actually is what those guys are doing
kolp has joined #neo900
<DocScrutinizer05>
recently there also were a few posts on tmo about ssl iirc
<drathir>
;/ i guess all time closer to switch at openbsd...
<DocScrutinizer05>
ROTFL
<DocScrutinizer05>
>>Now it appears as though the systemd developers have found a solution to kernel compatibility problems and a way to extend their philosophy of placing all key operating system components in one repository. According to Ivan Gotyaovich, one of the developers working on systemd, the project intends to maintain its own fork of the Linux kernel. "There are problems, problems in collaboration, problems with compatibility across versions.
<DocScrutinizer05>
Forking the kernel gives us control over these issues, gives us control over almost all key parts of the stack." << I don't know if that's a hoax
<Oksana>
Moin :-) A friend of mine, a few days (or was it a week?) ago said that due to my persistent "loud dislike" of systemd, said friend will try out the systemd - surely, somebody has to protect the poor victim of such attacks? It's not compatible with Unix philosophy - but then, it never pretended to be?
<Oksana>
Punchline: Last night, my friend uninstalled systemd with words that it just does not work. Like, suspend, resume, Apache web-server does not come return. And, uninstalling systemd took down a bunch of other packages, too, but none necessary for functioning.
<Oksana>
Also, my friend took down dbus, too. The only remotely useful thing which was depending on dbus was USB-flash-drive-auto-mount, and since it's possible to manually mount them without dbus, my friend doesn't consider it a critical loss.