<try-again>
I tried an older version ( opam switch create ocaml-base-compiler.4.07.0 ), but same problem
<try-again>
What is prims.c supposed to look like? (can I tell if my prims.c (which is generated) is bad, or if the libraries that it inks against that are bad?)
danielh1234 has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
zolk3ri has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
notnotdan has joined #ocaml
<notnotdan>
Hi
<notnotdan>
Dunno if this is the right place to ask OPAM questions, but I was wondering how to disable checksum checks in opam?
<notnotdan>
I tried running `opam install' with --no-checksums, but to no avail
Haudegen has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ShalokShalom has joined #ocaml
try-again has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
JimmyRcom has joined #ocaml
try-again has joined #ocaml
JimmyRcom has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
jao has joined #ocaml
jao has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
pmetzger has joined #ocaml
<pmetzger>
If it is giving you checksum errors that probably means the file is corrupted. Are you sure you want to build with a corrupted file?
<pmetzger>
That might not be in your interest.
nullifidian_ is now known as nullifidian
Haudegen has joined #ocaml
JimmyRcom has joined #ocaml
<notnotdan>
pmetzger: I don't think it is corrupted. It is more likely that something has changed when the archive was moved (it is a 200 redirect).
<notnotdan>
pmetzger: in any case, I've raised the issue with the maintainters of the package. But I still want to install it, and I still want to know if I am doing anything incorrectly
<notnotdan>
Otherwise it looks like a bug in opam
<pmetzger>
I doubt it is a bug. And the checksum legitimately isn't correct. So maybe you should just use opam pin (read the docs) with an altered checksum?
<notnotdan>
But what is the point of the `--no-checksums' option then?
<pmetzger>
Hrm. Maybe it is a bug. You want to file an issue?
<pmetzger>
I suspect not many people have ever used that flag, which may have caused rot.
pmetzger has quit []
JimmyRcom has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
JimmyRcom has joined #ocaml
try-again has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
<bartholin>
how could anyone prove anything before recursion
<bartholin>
recursion has first been used by Dedekind in 1888
ShalokShalom has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
ggole has quit [Quit: ggole]
fraxamo has joined #ocaml
metreo has joined #ocaml
try-again has joined #ocaml
metreo has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
notnotdan has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
liveuser has joined #ocaml
liveuser has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
theglass has quit [Excess Flood]
theglass has joined #ocaml
theglass has joined #ocaml
theglass has quit [Changing host]
zolk3ri has joined #ocaml
try-again has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jave_ has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
jave has joined #ocaml
metreo has joined #ocaml
metreo has left #ocaml [#ocaml]
metreo has joined #ocaml
ShalokShalom has joined #ocaml
notnotdan has joined #ocaml
notnotdan has quit [Client Quit]
orbifx has joined #ocaml
try-again has joined #ocaml
groovy2shoes has quit [Excess Flood]
groovy2shoes has joined #ocaml
ShalokShalom has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
keep_learning has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
<try-again>
I think the sed command in the primitives target in byterun/Makefile is not working as it should for me.
<try-again>
Parenthesis are used to extract a part of a sed-match. And the script relies on that i should get the largest match, but i don't... or so it appears to me.
metreo has left #ocaml [#ocaml]
metreo has joined #ocaml
<try-again>
For example, sed -n -e "s/CAMLprim value \([a-z0-9_][a-z0-9_]*\).*/\1/p" floats.c gives me, among other strings, the string "caml_po".
<try-again>
But no function caml_po exists in floats.c.
<try-again>
The string appears to be a match of the function CAMLprim value caml_power_float(value f, value g).
<try-again>
And this is why the build fails, I think.
<try-again>
Maybe the build would go through if the sed pattern in the makefile was changed to "s/CAMLprim value \([a-z0-9_][a-z0-9_]*\)/\1/p" ... but I don't know enough opam to be able to try this patch.