11:03 <luis> jackdaniel: I've tweaked your commit message to follow the 4th commandment (https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/#seven-rules) because I suffer from OCD

11:09 <jackdaniel> heh

11:09 <jackdaniel> thanks for morging

11:09 <jackdaniel> merging*

11:10 <jackdaniel> now here's a funny for you: if you separate subject from a body with a blank one, and the body is empty: is empty line due or because *there is* empty body, or not because *there is not any body* so there is no separator? ;_)

11:11 <luis> stassats: hey ho!

11:14 <jackdaniel> stassats: thanks for the commit bit

11:15 <stassats> eh, it's just so that i have to approve fewer PRs

11:15 <luis> jackdaniel: re rule #1, you've found a loophole :)

11:16 <luis> heh, feel free to use PRs if you're looking for untimely, nitpicking feedback though!

11:16 <stassats> and it's the old rule that the maintainers should be able to commit, because slime is great at using internal undocumented interfaces

11:16 <jackdaniel> I will, I'm collecting access bits for the ultimate trolling one day

11:16 <jackdaniel> I gain trust for years and then one day I'll make some silly commits *everywhere*

11:16 <jackdaniel> for giggles ;-)

11:17 <luis> It's nice to find purpose in life!

11:17 <stassats> i kinda treat swank/sbcl.lisp as part of sbcl

11:17 <jackdaniel> (this plan has a loophole too, unfortunately – sometimes I ultimately end up as a maintainer, so I'd act against myself :( )

11:19 <stassats> i also have a commit bit to ECL, so i'll retaliate

19:37 <margaritamike> Hi. Does SLIME have good support for refactoring Common Lisp code?

19:37 <margaritamike> I'm googling around and don't see much.

19:38 <jackdaniel> most part of refactoring is answering the question "what"

19:38 <jackdaniel> tooling is not as critical

19:38 <jackdaniel> there is lispcritic for criticizing your code