<GitHub>
[solvespace] whitequark commented on issue #265: > This is not a reason for rejecting PRs. I think we can make a special branch (community branch) and merge all the good PRs and let people use it, test it and fix it themselves. When features will be proven, we can just merge it in master.... https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/265#issuecomment-316101518
<GitHub>
[solvespace] whitequark commented on issue #265: To add to this, I consider an application with few features that work very well far more useful than an application that has everything and a kitchen sink but little complete parts. Does FreeCAD have a working assembly workbench yet? Last time I looked they had three and none of them were usable. That's where your approach ends in.... https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/265#issuecomme
<cr1901_modern>
^ Reminds me of those products which justify their complexity w/ "everybody needs a different 5%"
<cr1901_modern>
While it's on my mind, I forget: Solvespace creates GL contexts manually each OS, correct?