ChanServ changed the topic of #zig to: zig programming language | ziglang.org | be excellent to each other | channel logs: https://irclog.whitequark.org/zig/
atk has quit [Quit: Well this is unexpected.]
atk has joined #zig
quc has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
steveno_ has joined #zig
quc has joined #zig
JinShil has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
darithorn has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
steveno_ has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
return0e_ has joined #zig
return0e has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
steveno_ has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Client Quit]
steveno_ has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Client Quit]
donpdonp has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
donpdonp has joined #zig
isd has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
steveno_ has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Client Quit]
darithorn has joined #zig
darithorn_ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
darithorn_ has joined #zig
darithorn has quit [Quit: Leaving]
_0joshuaolson1 has joined #zig
<_0joshuaolson1>
Syntax/grammar question: why does Zig have the 'fn' keyword? For easy linear reading? Does it need it for unambiguous grammar?
<GitHub58>
zig/master 122a747 Andrew Kelley: zig fmt: use simple newlines rather than empty comments to hint...
steveno_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
steveno_ has joined #zig
<n_1-c_k>
Is it considered a format crime to replace 'fn foo() void {' with 'fn foo () void {'? The former looks a bit like a function call, like putting 'if(...)' instead of 'if (...)'.
davr0s has joined #zig
<andrewrk>
n_1-c_k, this sounds like a good discussion for #1003
<andrewrk>
currently the formatter will rewrite that example to the former
<n_1-c_k>
Thanks, I'll look...
steveno_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
steveno_ has joined #zig
steveno_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]