14:02 <al2o3-cr> will this be sufficient: ["name1", "name2"].include?(m.user.nick) && m.user.host == "myaffiliated/hostname" ?

14:04 <al2o3-cr> to only allow accounts belonging to me execute a specific

14:05 <dominikh> a) if you only accept commands in channels or from people who are in channels the bot is also in, then yes. otherwise you need to User#refresh before each check to avoid certain attacks b) you might as well just check for User#authname instead of nick + host

14:09 <al2o3-cr> dominikh: ok, this implies to a) so should be good to go?

14:10 <dominikh> yes.

14:10 <al2o3-cr> ok, thanks dominikh :)

14:19 <al2o3-cr> ¢host

14:20 <al2o3-cr> oops :(

14:52 <al2o3-cr> dominikh: When you mentioned User#authname, did you mean something like m.user.refresh; m.user.authed? && ["name1", "name2"].include?(m.user.authname) ?

14:53 <dominikh> well, no need for m.user.authed?, authname will be nil if he's not authed, and nil is probably not in that array of yours

14:53 <dominikh> but yes

14:55 <al2o3-cr> dominikh: ah, of course authed? will be nil and yeah thanks again

15:14 <al2o3-cr> dominikh: to positive could you have a look at this to see if it's correct: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/a22e009e7c1019ba1394 ?

15:15 <dominikh> probably. I won't sign off on code that runs arbitrary system commands for you :)

15:16 <eebs> o.0 That seems like a really bad idea… :P

15:17 <al2o3-cr> dominikh: sure i understand, it's hosted on c9 so not that important really :p