<sorcus>
Nicolab: Oh, i read only first part :-D :-D :-D
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> Haha
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> it's an interesting show. Gold mining seems like a lot of work. I've only done a little panning, myself
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> Indeed and a large financial investment to be amortized in one season
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> I think that's what makes him watch the next episode, damn it, he's got to find the gold!!
<FromGitter>
<j8r> @tenebrousedge there are people defending Germanic purism in English - talk with only Germanic words, no Latin ones
Flipez has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Flipez has joined #crystal-lang
<FromGitter>
<j8r> Alaska was russian long time ago, I wonder if there are still remains
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> We have one language per region lol
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> there are a few churches but the Russians didn't really build much
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> surely, there are expressions in all languages, borrow from others
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> using only Germanic words seems like an unusual hobby. I wonder if they also exclude Welsh constructs. That would eliminate more than half the language, at any rate
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> @Nicolab I think the Academie might disagree :P
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> ^^
<FromGitter>
<j8r> It's kind of talking like before the normans came, I guess
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> In my region people still speak fluent Basque (even in primary school). A very, very old language that has survived https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basque_language
<FromGitter>
<j8r> Some people think like that to defend an identity. For instance, avoiding englisicms in our language
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> In France too, that's why we're not good at English.
<FromGitter>
<j8r> Lol not sure, that's because English is hard
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> Avoiding Latin words would only get you so far. Old English was a pretty different language. It might be worth learning to speak it, but I don't know who you would talk to. Modern English isn't just Old English with new words
<FromGitter>
<j8r> Yep, usually there are a Germanic and Latin variant of a word
<FromGitter>
<Nicolab> the english accent is very hard, I won't understand what I'm writing or reading if I hear it.
<FromGitter>
<j8r> @Nicolab i doubt other latin countries perform significantly better
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> One thing that I don't recall as being part of Old English is our use of the word "do", as in, "Why do we use the word 'do'?"
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> "I don't know" vs. "I know not"
<FromGitter>
<straight-shoota> Database connection was lost
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> js is such a hot mess
ht_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<FromGitter>
<grkek> np;)
<FromGitter>
<grkek> does it need rebuilding, etc
<FromGitter>
<grkek> shards are missing
<FromGitter>
<grkek> @straight-shoota
<FromGitter>
<straight-shoota> What do you mean @grek?
baweaver has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> say i want to move a shard to an org, rename the repo and the shard. is that going to cause any issues with shards?
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> like would i be better off making a fresh repo in the org and archiving the other one, or move/rename it and delete tags or something?
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> I would assume that would cause issues
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> but I don't know how shards works
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> obs it would break existing installs, but would it still work if someone updated the info in their `shard.yml`?
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> id be ok with that, doubt anyone has these installed anyway :S
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> isn't that going to break the api too?
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> totally yes
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> I would archive and put a note in the README
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> if you've only had like four visitors/downloads then I would probably not worry about it
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> hmm
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> id like to keep the stars and history and such. API will be the same, just will need to do a find replace on the namespace
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> ill prob just transfer it to org, rename and test it, worst case i nuke the tags and start off at 0.1.0 again :shrug:
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> history is important. Stars are not, imo
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> but i like my ⭐ :p
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> they're nice to have
<FromGitter>
<Blacksmoke16> shardbox says im the only one that has it installed (thats public at least) so meh
* FromGitter
* Blacksmoke16 wishes he made an org before making all these shards
<FromGitter>
<tenebrousedge> a Blacksmoke org? o.o
<FromGitter>
<Daniel-Worrall> @Blacksmoke16 Moving repos creates symlinks in github, and shards would handle those links perfectly fine since it uses git as the backend
<FromGitter>
<Daniel-Worrall> As long as you don't create an identical user/repo name, the link remains