19:28 <cheater> are there languages that are both basic and forth at the same time?

19:41 <MrMobius> some of the HP graphng calculators use a stack language similar to Forth and have a basic built in that converts internally to the Forth like language

19:41 <MrMobius> I think you can write basic in a string and execute it from Forth

19:51 <lispmacs[work]> cheater: the TI calculators come with ti-basic, but people had written forth implementations for them.

19:52 <lispmacs[work]> https://hackaday.com/2019/01/25/pocket-forth-invades-your-ti-calculator/

19:53 <lispmacs[work]> you could run a ti-84 on tiemu

20:00 <cheater> oh that's interesting but i was more thinking of a language that is both /at the same time/

21:13 <lispmacs[work]> cheater: that sounds like some kind of immoral perversion

21:13 <cheater> why

21:13 <cheater> i think it could be fun

21:14 <lispmacs[work]> I guess maybe I should ask what you mean exactly

21:15 <lispmacs[work]> you could write forth words to match to basic, with delayed processing of arguments

21:20 <lispmacs[work]> i guess the question if you are intending to implement syntax checking on the basic stuff. I think properly speaking forth does haven't syntax, right...?

21:21 <lispmacs[work]> *forth doesn't