06:13 <tomeu> mmind00: ok, so I guess for the purposes of upstreaming this device I will look at disabling DP

06:14 <tomeu> ok, that was easy

12:52 <tomeu> mmind00: I'm not sure where I should insert my entry in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt because the file isn't in alphabetical order atm

12:53 <tomeu> that was my best guess

14:27 <mmind00> tomeu: yeah, the binding.txt is slightly messy ... just let it be then :-)

14:38 <tomeu> mmind00: cool, does it look nice to you? http://paste.debian.net/1052974/

14:43 <mmind00> tomeu: nope ... vcc3v3_sys is a child of vcc5v0_core, which is a child of vdd_5v and vdd_5v is the root voltage of the system it seems ... same with vcc5v0_sys also being a child of vdd_5v

14:44 <mmind00> tomeu: bigger issue with vcc_phy ... as that is of course not defined in the schematics at all

14:45 <mmind00> tomeu: while it isn't necessary to model all the tiny opaque regulators, I'd really like to have the core rails modelled correctly

14:46 <mmind00> tomeu: there is a nice comment in rk3399-gru.dtsi about why it's cool to have a somewhat complete power-tree :-)

14:48 <mmind00> tomeu: power tree of the nanopi is on pages 12-15 of the schematics it seems

14:52 <tomeu> mmind00: cool, thanks

14:52 <tomeu> my schematic read skills aren't that good, and this one seems a bit crappier than other boards with rk3399