08:51 <wadim_> @mrjay: the rk818 has some nice charging and battery features. But the vendor implementation was very messy. And I think it would require quite a lot of internal knowledge from rockchip because I think the reference manual may be incomplete

10:05 <mrjay> wadim_: yeap ... on those two features i care

10:05 <mrjay> wadim_: i see you looked into subject

10:39 <mrjay> does rockchip proprietary loader uses dtb file saved in resource partition?

10:40 <mrjay> i'm asking because i think i messed up ... i've flashed dtb without emmc node and now i can't flash anything to emmc

11:54 <dlezcano> mmind00, hi

11:54 <dlezcano> mmind00, is it possible to use the opp 2.0GHz defined for the rk3399-gru for the rock960 ?

11:57 <mmind00> dlezcano: hey ... when you get someone from either Rockchip or Vamrs to acknowledge that the chip on the rock960 is specified for that speed ;-)

11:58 <mmind00> especially with cpu speeds / voltages in mainline I really want to stay in the official specs ... overclocking is everyones own choice

12:02 <dlezcano> mmind00, I want to do some experiment with thermal but the SoC does not heat enough :)

12:02 <mmind00> dlezcano: haha ... I guess you should be able to just use the other op1-opp include for your tests?

12:03 <dlezcano> mmind00, yes

12:04 <dlezcano> mmind00, is it acceptable to use for rock960 ? I mean this separation is made on purpose ?

12:06 <mmind00> dlezcano: not 100% sure ... like the OP1 is the rk3399 variant used in chromebooks, and I guess there was just a selection as production time, for what spec they're usable?

12:06 <mmind00> dlezcano: if in doubt just copy the 2GHz point over to the general opp.dtsi for your test

12:06 <mmind00> dlezcano: as I've just seen that the voltages for the other OPPs also differ between the variants

12:09 <dlezcano> mmind00, ok, I'll give a try