sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs
hedgeberg has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
mumptai_ has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
siruf has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
siruf has joined #m-labs
hedgeberg has joined #m-labs
hedgeberg has quit [Client Quit]
hedgeberg has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
glitchwitch has joined #m-labs
hedgeberg has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
glitchwitch has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
hedgeberg has joined #m-labs
<GitHub>
[artiq] dhslichter commented on issue #535: I agree with @jordens; the most important thing to do here would be to implement a "standard" hard FP instruction set. Basically the thing to do would be to implement all the instructions defined in the openrisc standard (ORFPX32) but not actually implemented in mor1kx. The sin/cos/log/exp functions could then be constructed from these with (hopefully) reasonable performance, and we can decide later if they
_whitelogger has joined #m-labs
<larsc>
I'm wondering from a power perspective what would be better in an FPGA, a long combinatorial chain or an equivalent circuit with pipelining registers
rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<rjo>
larsc: assuming same overall throughput, length, routing, logic resources, and the two cases only differing in pipeline registers being bypassed or not, the pipelined version would be worse if a bypassed register uses less power than an in-use one.
<rjo>
but other factors will probably be dominant in practice.
<larsc>
but having the register will cause less glitching
<larsc>
it will block the glitches from propagating until the output value has settled
<larsc>
but does this offset the extra power consumtion by the FF?
karan_ has joined #m-labs
karan_ has quit [Client Quit]
<rjo>
larsc: right. that will depend a lot on the logic graph.
<sb0>
also, with a long comb graph, is it just glitches or do the gates also spend a longer time in intermediate voltages that cause more CMOS power dissipation?
<GitHub>
[artiq] r-srinivas commented on issue #432: What would happen if the previous experiment modifies a dataset that's called in the prepare of the subsequent experiment? That would mean it would get preloaded onto the kernel before that dataset was modified, right? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/432#issuecomment-287842632