01:24 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1173: > AFAICT the delay is an artifact of the PHYs failure to support 'zero-duration' methods.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1173#issuecomment-428785997

01:28 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1173: > AFAICT the reason for the API difference is not the feasibility of implementing batching but the fact that batching was implemented for AD9914 (hence the adherence to the preivous zero-duration `set()`) while it wasn't and isn't implemented for Urukul. That makes the ad9914 driver a bit tedious to use... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1173#issuecomme

05:52 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens closed issue #1174: with parallel urukul.set() broken https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1174

08:11 <cr1901_modern> sb0: https://twitter.com/OlofKindgren/status/1050297746073288704

08:23 <cr1901_modern> It is a proof of concept of course, but might be a neat way to share migen code/facilitate reuse. IMO publishing python packages for each migen design isn't all that appropriate. Most migen packages tend to be "composite" repositories of cores tuned to a specific purpose. Namely misoc, litex, HDMI2USB.

13:17 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/661dd00c4cbe1f9e1c48be467b34f30b96409289

13:17 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 661dd00 Robert Jördens: ad9912: phase offset is 14 bit LSB aligned...

13:50 <bb-m-labs> build #1904 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1904

14:06 <bb-m-labs> build #1905 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1905

14:11 <bb-m-labs> build #2625 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2625