11:22 <tankf33der> https://i.imgur.com/9Eq0FcQ.jpg

11:22 <tankf33der> im in lietuva, birstonas city

13:08 <Regenaxer> beautiful

15:25 <Blue_flame> Can someone who is on SO & has comment abilities add one under this answer about environments in pil? It seems like closures are absent and no equivalent or higher mechanism exists. https://stackoverflow.com/a/40819002/9191510 This wiki link should suffice: https://picolisp.com/wiki/?firstclassenvironments

15:27 <Blue_flame> Was searching picolisp on stack where i found pil mentioned in some. Wasn't specifically hunting or something! :D

15:28 <Blue_flame> (bye)/

17:01 <DKordic> [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tak_(function)][tarai]] is a recursion benchmark.

17:47 <Regenaxer> PicoLisp *does* have closures, see 'job' or 'curry'

17:48 <Regenaxer> Ah, didn't see the picolisp.com link

17:49 <Regenaxer> Forgot that I wrote that ;)

17:50 <Regenaxer> So indeed if someone with write access could add it to SO

17:50 <jcowan> I have access; what should be written where?

17:51 <jcowan> Oh, the link. Sure.

17:51 <Regenaxer> The link https://picolisp.com/wiki/?firstclassenvironments into the SO discussion

17:52 <Regenaxer> In the SO discussion is a note about PicoLisp which is wrong

17:52 <Regenaxer> "PicoLisp has only dynamic binding and thus closures doesn't exist"

17:53 <Regenaxer> Dynamic binding does not prohibit closures

17:54 <jcowan> I meant it does not provide static binding through the regular procedure-creating mechanism.

17:54 <jcowan> I've put the link in.

17:54 <Regenaxer> Cool! Thanks!

17:55 <Regenaxer> and yes, in Pil closures are done explicitly (manually kind of)

17:55 <jcowan> apparently I have enough whuffie to be the first answer, even though nobody has upvoted me yet.

17:57 <Regenaxer> whuffie? ;)

18:00 <jcowan> mmm, reputational "currency"; the ability to convince someone you are correct/just/knowledgeable/whatever because of your reputation.

18:01 <Regenaxer> OK, thought something like that