logand` has joined #picolisp
Seteeri has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
logand has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
aw- has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
mmmattyx has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
aw- has joined #picolisp
orivej has joined #picolisp
_whitelogger has joined #picolisp
vikid has joined #picolisp
ym has joined #picolisp
DerGuteMoritz has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
vikid has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
vikid has joined #picolisp
Seteeri has joined #picolisp
aw- has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
orivej has joined #picolisp
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
mmmattyx has joined #picolisp
<
beneroth>
Regenaxer, do you have experience with using +Bool relations in an +Aux? Like (+Aux +Ref +Bool) (<+Link rel>) ?
<
Regenaxer>
Hi beneroth! No, I think I never did
<
beneroth>
I would like to do (aux) even with NIL values. Not sure if that works, need to try out.
<
beneroth>
+Bool is a special flag
<
Regenaxer>
and NIL is not indexed as you know
<
beneroth>
I know a single NIL is not indexed, but I'm not sure about behavior in a +Aux list
<
beneroth>
so you say this will not work? (but I should try out) ?
<
Regenaxer>
right, the match works
<
beneroth>
I have multiple +B for each A+. I want an efficient way to check if there are any +B with +Bool = T for a given +A obj
<
Regenaxer>
I think this is good
<
Regenaxer>
filter for bools here
<
Regenaxer>
Typical apx is numbers and strings, which can be empty too
<
Regenaxer>
so it should work fine with bool
Seteeri has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
orivej has joined #picolisp
Blukunfando has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]