09:17 <yurb> After running `raco pkg install --link` for my package, whenever I edit a file I must also run `raco setup -l mycollection` in order to refresh the compiled bytecode; I though racket would automatically invalidate the bytecode if I edit code - or is it always "use the bytecode, period"?

09:18 <yurb> More generally, how to conveniently work on code that's been link-installed?

11:25 <quicoju> Hello! I'm new to racket. I'm for a way to capture Unix signals in a non-blocking way. I've been looking into with the "unix-signals" package but I only see an example of blocking while waiting for a signal. I'd appreciate any suggestion onthis.

11:47 <drdo> Is there something in the library to chain calls that return #f as a failure value? Analogous to the maybe monad

11:53 <quicoju> I only see two ways of checking the captured signal `read-signal' which blocks until a singal is caught and the `next-signal-evt' which also blocks if I call it as `(sync next-signal-evt)'.

13:55 <inconnu_xd> Hi I have just started learning Scheme as a part of my uni course, is there a way to highlight all imported functions from r5rs for example in code? Default syntax highlighting does not handle this properly

14:19 <bremner> inconnu_xd: in drracket you can hover over an indentifier to see where it is imported from. Also, anything not defined will trigger an error message

14:20 <bremner> (on the bar at the bottom)

14:37 <inconnu_xd> @bre

14:39 <inconnu_xd> bremner I know that but it would be nice if the imported functions had different color than what I wrote, I tried changing symbols color in settings but that would change the whole text, also tried opening it in neovim and there is seems to work (r5rs functions are colored)

18:46 <sschwarzer> Currently I have two identifiers in the same module which conflict. One is the accessor `group-tasks` for the field `tasks` in the `group` struct. The other identifier is a procedure to group tasks. (I already have a procedure `sort-tasks`.) What do you suggest to resolve the name conflict?

18:48 <sschwarzer> I read about Scheme naming conventions, but didn't find anything that helped me.

18:48 <sschwarzer> Should I rename `sort-tasks` to `sort/tasks` and call the grouping procedure `group/tasks`? Would this be idiomatic?