HostFat has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<stellar-slack>
<donovan> I think supporting ranges of protocols leads to a lot of complexity. A possible simplification is to reduce any instance to only support a current protocol and the next protocol, possibly indicated by a hash of the xdr definitions in source code form. An instance advertises these two supported protocols in its hello message. I guess the ultimate goal is to ensure that a majority of instances can migrate from
<stellar-slack>
to a new ledger.
pixelbeat has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<stellar-slack>
<donovan> Historical replay-ability is a very important feature of the Stellar design, in my view. A transaction executed in ledger 32569 (!) needs to be able to be executable by an instance years later, which may have a completely different code path for that transaction type and have multiple bugfixes applied. In an ideal world every transaction processing change would be archived in the code itself. One possible ide
<stellar-slack>
(16-bit?) for each message type. An Offer might be 0001 and a AccountCreate might be 0002, and so on, in the first release. Any code change requires an increment for the affected message type and both the new and the old are both supported for replay but only the latest is accepted for new ledgers. Clients would have to have a way to get the latest accepted message type versions from the server. This continues for ever
<stellar-slack>
time. Hopefully you don’t end up applying so many fixes that 65536 message types are exhausted :simple_smile:
<stellar-slack>
<scott> I’m concerned about the implications of "Supported implementations lifetime considerations” section. IMO `stellar-core` itself needs to be able to replay history forevermore.
sv-logger has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
sv-logger has joined #stellar-dev
<stellar-slack>
<lab> stellar-core is processing consensus online. history is irrelavant.
<stellar-slack>
<lab> the whole lifetime supporting is only needed by history processing, eg, ledger explorer/analyzer
<stellar-slack>
<lab> donovan: +1 we need compact and pragmatic protocol.
<stellar-slack>
<lab> event versioning is the heel of event sourcing.
nelisky has quit [Quit: nelisky]
[7] has quit [Disconnected by services]
TheSeven has joined #stellar-dev
stellar-slack has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
stellar-slack has joined #stellar-dev
pixelb has joined #stellar-dev
dobson has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
dobson has joined #stellar-dev
pixelb has quit [Quit: Leaving]
pixelb has joined #stellar-dev
nelisky has joined #stellar-dev
nelisky has quit [Quit: nelisky]
Kwelstr has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
Kwelstr has joined #stellar-dev
nelisky has joined #stellar-dev
nelisky has quit [Quit: nelisky]
de_henne has joined #stellar-dev
<stellar-slack>
<scott> event versioning really isn’t that tough provided you’re disciplined. A good test suite helps to keep you that way.
<stellar-slack>
<monsieurnicolas> @donovan: the protocolVersion acts as a global version number for everything (so it's the generalized version of the 16 bit counter). Operations may change, but there are other things in the runtime that are not representable in the xdr file, the way we merge buckets for example. You can imagine protocolVersion being a rough approximation of the build number in a single implementation world, things
<stellar-slack>
several implementations that move at different pace.
<stellar-slack>
The reason for a range is that it's actually the same code than for dealing with previous/next: the rollout of versions still requires humans to make a decision.
<stellar-slack>
As far as capability to replay history: I think we'll try to keep the stellar implementation compatible with the entire history for as long as we can. I don't think that it's a practical thing to do over the course of several years as the only way to guarantee support for older transactions is to actually replay everything from genesis - no other test suite can really give better guarantees as the implementation and
<stellar-slack>
subtle way (like there was a compiler bug that triggered one behavior over another).
nelisky has joined #stellar-dev
nelisky has quit [Client Quit]
nelisky has joined #stellar-dev
de_henne has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<bittrex-richie>
is anyone having problems with the sfd servers?
<stellar-slack>
<jed> bittrex what is going wrong?
<bittrex-richie>
its not connecting properly
<bittrex-richie>
been ahving intermittent connection issues for almost 12 hours
<bittrex-richie>
using steller-rest and it says websocket connected.. but when i query it, getting an error back
<stellar-slack>
<jed> bittrex. hmm yeah looks like they are still having issues. really can't wait to be on the new network
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> hmm did you fix something?
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> just came back alive
<stellar-slack>
<eva> it's intermittent, so it may be on and off for you
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> oh :disappointed:
nelisky has quit [Quit: nelisky]
nelisky has joined #stellar-dev
hachiya has joined #stellar-dev
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> and its dead again meh
nelisky has quit [Quit: nelisky]
<stellar-slack>
<jed> thanks richiela. I had to restart some of the public nodes. It should be back in action shortly
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> still toast.. or it died again.. no sure which
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> it says the socket is connected
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> but it never gets the subscribe message
<stellar-slack>
<jed> yeah still looking into it *sigh*
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> coolio
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> someoen should host two servers for redundancy :wink:
<stellar-slack>
<andrew> we do host multiple servers its just that stellard is a big pile of you know what which is why we're moving to the new network as fast as possible.
<stellar-slack>
<andrew> its called "acccount management" and it allows a user of the demo to generate new accounts in a more seamless way, and then store them locally so they can refer back to them to set up scenarios. it also provides actions on each of the stored accounts to prefill in the various actions with the accounts address and secret.
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> very cool
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> going to make all of us write new code though aren't ya? :simple_smile:
<stellar-slack>
<andrew> yeah but you'll love it
<stellar-slack>
<andrew> the new API scott's cookin' up is a dream to code to
<stellar-slack>
<richiela> grin.. they all say that.. but no one every thinks about us poor exchanges heh