13:42 <irker118> systemtap: zhouwj-fnst systemtap.git:refs/heads/master * release-2.9-164-g77c4949 / testsuite/systemtap.base/func_definition.exp testsuite/systemtap.base/func_definition.stp: Add testcase for function definitions. http://tinyurl.com/ot3k32k

15:19 <irker118> systemtap: flu systemtap.git:refs/heads/master * release-2.9-165-gb113d36 / NEWS man/stapprobes.3stap: Add a comment about perf probes .hz field. http://tinyurl.com/hdmhc7d

15:20 <fche> thanks felix

15:20 <flu> np

16:00 <irker118> systemtap: flu systemtap.git:refs/heads/master * release-2.9-166-g7abf645 / vim/syntax/stp.vim: Add vim syntax highlight for new private keyword http://tinyurl.com/q8xelp7

20:23 <irker118> systemtap: dsmith systemtap.git:refs/heads/master * release-2.9-167-gc788eb1 / runtime/linux/kprobes.c runtime/transport/symbols.c tapsets.cxx testsuite/systemtap.base/kmodule.exp: Add RHEL7.2 fixes for PR18889 so that we can probe module initializers. http://tinyurl.com/q6od2cz

22:05 <gtaylor|away> When I run https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1259023 , it fails with "semantic error: unresolved arity-2 function: identifier 'format_ipaddr' at delip.stp", which in the script is format_ipaddr($ifap->ifa_address, AF_INET). How do I make this work?

22:08 <fche> gctaylor, hi

22:08 <gctaylor> Hi fche

22:08 <fche> checking out that page

22:10 <fche> the basic questions to start with - what os (rhel?) are you running, andwhat version of stap (stap -V)

22:11 <fche> (by the way, that script works on fedora22 - except that module("ipv6") doesn't exist any more because ipv6 is compiled into the kernel there)

22:12 <gctaylor> rhel 6.2/Systemtap translator/driver (version 1.6/0.152 non-git sources)

22:12 <fche> hm, that access.redhat.com article is from 2014, stap 1.6 is from 2011

22:13 <fche> any chance of getting stap from rhel6.7 era?

22:14 <gctaylor> Not likely. :( Locked on 6.2 for a while yet. Long after the problem we're trying to solve anyway.

22:15 <fche> you can get a newer stap and run it on an otherwise older rhel

22:17 <gctaylor> Seems like that's what I should try. Was hoping the article had a simple typo.

22:17 <fche> nothing obviously wrong there, I'm afraid :-)

22:18 <gctaylor> Thanks for your help. I'm twice as far along now as I was this morning.

22:18 <fche> hey no problem

22:18 <fche> if you have trouble getting a hold of the newer rpms, let us know

22:19 <fche> but alternatively if you're stuck with that old stap, we can probably come up with something that'll work on that