faustinoaq changed the topic of #amber to: Welcome to Amber Framework community! | https://amberframework.org | Developer happiness, productivity and bare metal performance | GH: https://github.com/amberframework | Docs: https://docs.amberframework.org | Gitter: https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber | IRC Logger: https://irclog.whitequark.org/amber | Amber::Server.start
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <mixflame> ;)
waheedi has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <damianham> When scaffolding out a resource I used name of 'Path' which was fine in crystal v0.27 but is a new struct in v0.28 so I had a name clash for the model. The upshot is I have had to rename the resource. Not a big problem as it is early days in the life of this app. I probably shouldn't have used such a common name for a resource. Would it be useful to suffix generated models with 'Model' as we do with controllers
<FromGitter> ... so there is no possibility of a name clash with a future version of crystal ?
<waheedi> FromGitter: Good story :), well, I think adding 'Model' to each model resource would be a big change. I think the naming needs to be better described/defined. As Path used in this example is really simple, yet it can mean many different things.
<FromGitter> waheedi, I'm a bot, *bleep, bloop*. I relay messages between here and https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <rmarronnier> Hey all, do any of you has an idea when amber 0.28 would be released? Days / weeks? I'm relying on the heroku amber build pack which relies on crystal 0.28
<FromGitter> <rmarronnier> @damianham Maybe a check against a list of protected names would be enough ? Crystal syntax will eventually settle down :-)
waheedi has quit [Quit: waheedi]