faustinoaq changed the topic of #amber to: Welcome to Amber Framework community! | https://amberframework.org | Developer happiness, productivity and bare metal performance | GH: https://github.com/amberframework | Docs: https://docs.amberframework.org | Gitter: https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber | IRC Logger: https://irclog.whitequark.org/amber | Amber::Server.start
alexherbo24 has joined #amber
alexherbo24 has quit [Client Quit]
alexherbo2 has joined #amber
_whitelogger has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <mark_smith_gitlab> Hello guys, I am trying to run my webapp application build with amberframework inside a FreeBSD jail. Sadly I cannot make quartzmailer work since it doesn't send the mail and the webapp crashes. I'm still using the 0.34 amber with 0.6 quartz mailer and on linux everything works perfectly
<FromGitter> <mark_smith_gitlab> So I was assuming that freebsd maybe lacks some dependency
<FromGitter> <mark_smith_gitlab> For the test I even tried setting the mailerver to 127.0.0.1 on the port 2525 and made netcat listening on that port, but nothing happens, the app still crashes
<FromGitter> <mark_smith_gitlab> I am running out of ideas, has anyone encountered a similar issue?
alexherbo2 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<FromGitter> <drujensen> @mark_smith_gitlab I have not. Have you tried running inside a docker container?
<FromGitter> <drujensen> docker-compose up -d
<FromGitter> <drujensen> I use mail catcher for development
<FromGitter> <drujensen> I use a docker image: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/drujensen/mailcatcher
alexherbo2 has joined #amber
alexherbo2 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
alexherbo2 has joined #amber
alexherbo2 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
alexherbo2 has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <eliasjpr> @drujensen In regards to Amber cluster option I am in agreement with you that we should consider removing it and instead document an alternative approach such as: ⏎ ⏎ `````` [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5f2d8c25811d3571b3b13035]
<FromGitter> <eliasjpr> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/amberframework/amber?at=5f2d8c2ce20413052e716e9a]
alexherbo2 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
alexherbo2 has joined #amber
<FromGitter> <damianham> @drujensen Yes if Andrew's plugin implementation is the preferred option with the core team I have no problem with that so it has my blessing :). I haven't tried it out - I use my plugin implementation in 3 projects now and it works very well for me. Dru you are absolutely right - if the base render macro could support rendering assets in the current folder - making my render_module shard redundant - I would be
<FromGitter> ... delighted. I suppose that before deciding on which plugin implementation to adopt some members of the core team should try both of them out and see which they find the easiest to work with. There are pros and cons to both implementations.
<FromGitter> <drujensen> Thanks @damianham
<FromGitter> <eliasjpr> @damianham I would like to work with you to add support for modular approach and still use the render macro. Let me know when you have some time we can hop on a hangout or something and walk thru the solution