sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs
sb0 has joined #m-labs
gric has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
sandeepkr__ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
fengling has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
kuldeep has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
kuldeep has joined #m-labs
sandeepkr has joined #m-labs
gric has joined #m-labs
fengling has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
fengling has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
sb0 has joined #m-labs
sandeepkr has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
sandeepkr has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
sb0 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sb0 has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<sb0>
whitequark, how is the si chip programming coming along?
<whitequark>
figuring out the SoC right now
britton has joined #m-labs
<britton>
ARTIQ hardware FAQ posted to mailing list on April 8 to the mailing list. It states "The FPGA used in Sayma boards is XC7K325T (resource requirements: 28 kLUT, 14% of the chip per DAC IQ channel pair at 1.25 GS/s, 16 bit)." I assume the worst-case resource utilization for a single arbitrary (not IQ) channel is 28 kLUT. If planning on 8 such DAC channels 8*28 = 224 kLUT which is only 69% of XC7K325T. Right?
<sb0>
britton, that chip has 203K LUTs
<sb0>
for 7-series, the LUT count is CLB flip-flop divided by two. thank xilinx marketing for messing that up.
<sb0>
look at XC7K410T or 420T
<sb0>
and that's for 1.25GS/s, for 2.5 the resource requirements double
<sb0>
(unless we do some clever tricks)
britton has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
acathla_ has joined #m-labs
sb0 has joined #m-labs
<sb0>
wow
<sb0>
I'm usually pissed with the state of linux hardware support, but this time it deserves credit
<sb0>
had to scan some paperwork, scanner had a "out of order" label on it, after fiddling around with it a bit i notice the windows driver looks flaky
<sb0>
so I connect the USB cable to my laptop, run xsane, click "scan", AND IT WORKS!!!
<sb0>
amazing
<whitequark>
this is my typical experience with linux hardware