01:50 <GitHub77> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #207 52c6c2d: Address listed twice (for real this time :smile:) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187786999

01:50 <GitHub177> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #207 52c6c2d: My bad. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187787022

01:50 <GitHub135> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #207 52c6c2d: Same. This command also fails for me. Did you mean `ip -6 route add default via ...`? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187787005

02:22 <sb0> hartytp, you should run the backtrace through addr2line, and also check what's at the address of the illegal instruction

09:19 <travis-ci> ProgVal/smoltcp#1 (ndisc-multiple-options - fbd495c : Valentin Lorentz): The build passed.

09:19 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/ProgVal/smoltcp/compare/3c47f1bcbafe^...fbd495ce7da1

09:19 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/ProgVal/smoltcp/builds/378308587

13:28 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/4ed9fdbf2701...32522be413b7

13:28 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 32522be whitequark: satman: use 1K log buffer and 4K stack....

13:28 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master ee4c475 whitequark: gateware: fix Sayma satellite build....

13:46 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/32522be413b7...f383a470fe69

13:46 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master f383a47 whitequark: satman: do not debug print unexpected aux packets....

13:46 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master aa42a69 whitequark: libdrtioaux: always inline read/write helpers....

14:10 <bb-m-labs> build #1504 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1504

14:20 <bb-m-labs> build #875 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/875

14:24 <bb-m-labs> build #2326 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2326

15:03 <bb-m-labs> build #1505 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1505

15:12 <bb-m-labs> build #876 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/876

15:16 <bb-m-labs> build #2327 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2327

15:30 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/f383a470fe69...3027951dd85d

15:30 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master c8d91b2 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: coredevice: add new ad9914 driver

15:30 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 663d8e6 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: ad9914: optimize extended-resolution mode

15:30 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 3027951 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: integrate new AD9914 driver...

15:32 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #54: There seems to be no interest in this. Closing. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/54#issuecomment-388635447

15:35 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq closed issue #990: test_clock_generator_loopback fails https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/990

15:37 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #984: @KaifengC Do you still have this problem? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/984#issuecomment-388635738

15:41 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 2 new commits to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/9c6978be8405...1c4c5c9d96c3

15:41 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 1c4c5c9 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: coredevice/dds: fix bus_channel doc

15:41 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 bb91582 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: coredevice/dds: fix init_duration_mu and init_sync_duration_mu

16:01 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/00cb31b80440432b40cc32863321680153894ed3

16:01 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 00cb31b hartytp: sampler: remove v_ref parameter (#988)

16:09 <bb-m-labs> build #1506 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1506

16:13 <bb-m-labs> build #2328 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_2] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2328 blamelist: Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sb@m-labs.hk>

16:19 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/194d6462eec5483c31e90e86642b0bfa8e14a884

16:19 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 194d646 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: ad9914: fix set_mu

16:51 <bb-m-labs> build #1507 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1507

16:55 <bb-m-labs> build #2329 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_2] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2329 blamelist: Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sb@m-labs.hk>

17:35 <bb-m-labs> build #1508 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1508

17:44 <bb-m-labs> build #877 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/877

17:47 <GitHub196> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #207 52c6c2d: Ugh I'm wrong again! The `fe` -> `fd` keeps confusing me lol https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187808370

17:47 <GitHub101> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #207: Looks good once the `route` command is fixed. Thanks for working on this! https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#issuecomment-388643913

17:48 <bb-m-labs> build #2330 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2330

17:58 <GitHub37> [smoltcp] ProgVal commented on pull request #207 52c6c2d: Oh, I forgot the `add` after `route` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187808825

18:01 <GitHub162> [smoltcp] ProgVal commented on pull request #207 fe8d4ed: Do you think I should use a different prefix to make it clearer? (eg. `fdaa::/64`) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187808886

18:03 <travis-ci> ProgVal/smoltcp#2 (ipv6-gateway - 2be4c6d : Valentin Lorentz): The build has errored.

18:03 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/ProgVal/smoltcp/compare/52c6c2d61a83...2be4c6dbb2ae

18:03 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/ProgVal/smoltcp/builds/378429387

18:11 <GitHub49> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #207 fe8d4ed: Yeah, that would be great! Could you also squash your commits? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187809099

18:30 <travis-ci> ProgVal/smoltcp#3 (ipv6-gateway - c08b8b5 : Valentin Lorentz): The build passed.

18:30 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/ProgVal/smoltcp/compare/fe8d4ed7d0ac...c08b8b50ba93

18:30 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/ProgVal/smoltcp/builds/378434816

18:35 <GitHub106> [smoltcp] ProgVal commented on pull request #207 c08b8b5: Done https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/207#discussion_r187809658

21:20 <GitHub124> [smoltcp] barskern commented on issue #104: I resolved this problem, and I have no refined the test to detect a fast retransmit. Further I'm thinking about how to store the number of duplicated ACK's received. For a testing it I am planning on defining it as a field on the `TcpSocket` struct, however I think that this will unnessecary clutter an already huge struct. I haven't refined my ideas yet, but I was thinking