04:11 <Wikiwide> Good morning! It was blue screen of death

05:36 <jonwil> Will Neo900 include fingerprint reader or any other biometric sensor? I am hoping it wont, those things are insecure.

05:42 <wpwrak> it will have a great number of sensors that can gather information that is both biometric and highly personal if not embarrassing. e.g., it will have microphones that will record your voice with fiendishly high accuracy. and all the "adult" self-portraits you'll snap with the built-on cameras, well ...

05:43 <wpwrak> but no, no fingerprint reader. unless you leave a print on one of the cameras :)

05:44 <jonwil> Good that it wont be following (cr)apple and using biuometrics to protect the phone, especially in light of http://www.macrumors.com/2014/10/31/fingerprints-not-protected-by-fifth-amendment/

05:44 <wpwrak> btw, "insecure" is relative. if people use, say, a fingerprint reader, to protect something they could not be inconvenienced to protect otherwise, then that insecure device still improves overall security

05:45 <jonwil> true

05:45 <jonwil> but a password is better than a fingerprint reader given how easy it is to fool fingerprint readers (

05:46 <wpwrak> as long as you can get people to not make if "asdf" or something else from those top 10 ;-)

05:50 <wpwrak> (top10) i suppose you've seen this one ? http://zed0.co.uk/crossword/

11:03 <DocScrutinizer05> seven (7) donations per money transfer in September, total of ~900EUR

11:03 <DocScrutinizer05> err October

11:07 <DocScrutinizer05> five (5) direct donations per money transfer in September, ~2600EUR thanks to Oksana

11:37 <DocScrutinizer05> PP Sep http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopKE1874.png

11:38 <DocScrutinizer05> PP Oct broken http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopZw1874.png

11:41 <DocScrutinizer05> anyway this seems correct for Oct: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopLb1874.png

15:09 <DocScrutinizer05> so 5 + 18 new device reservations in Sep, 7 + 13 in Oct

15:10 <DocScrutinizer05> = 43 total in Sep 1. .. Oct 30.

15:17 <jake42> quite a number :-)

15:27 <DocScrutinizer05> actually it's 2 more since oksana's counts as 3

22:18 <freemangordon> jonwil: stupid, am I :) https://gitorious.org/pulseaudio-nokia/pulseaudio-nokia/commit/b588351f28356b7856701d0bd368f514b2630bef

22:19 <jonwil> xo does record work now?

22:20 <freemangordon> still not, but the output from stock and foss mudrc_process (given the same input) matches

22:20 <freemangordon> so eap is 100% functional

22:21 <jonwil> ok, great

22:21 <freemangordon> for 2 MiB samples

22:23 <freemangordon> seems there is something elase, in the PA stuff

22:23 <freemangordon> *else

22:24 <wpwrak> freemangordon: so it was pointer mixup in the end ?

22:24 <wpwrak> (the gain mystery)

22:24 <freemangordon> or rather paramters mixup

22:25 <wpwrak> same effect :)

22:25 <freemangordon> naah, the gain mistery is still there

22:25 <wpwrak> maybe more of the same then ?

22:25 <freemangordon> no, I guess 2MiB of samples would trigger it

22:26 <freemangordon> maybe gcc -O3 plays it smart

22:26 <jonwil> if all the functions in EAP are verified as working the same stock vs extra, maybe try the drc functions and see

22:26 <freemangordon> won't be the first time

22:26 <freemangordon> jonwil: look at the backscroll :)

22:26 <freemangordon> "still not, but the output from stock and foss mudrc_process (given the same input) matches"

22:26 <jonwil> oh ok

22:27 <jonwil> weird then

22:27 <freemangordon> that finctions gets left and right channel inputs and produces l/r outputs

22:27 <freemangordon> those match for 2MiB samples

22:28 <freemangordon> but recorded video still hase werid sound

22:28 <freemangordon> *has

22:29 <jonwil> well I am stumped

22:29 <freemangordon> it could be something in set_drc_volume or in mumdrc_write_parameters

22:29 <jonwil> possible, try stock of both

22:30 <freemangordon> this is what I use to test it http://pastebin.com/HbCaWzfe

22:31 <freemangordon> both outputs and (most of) the internal structures match

22:33 <jonwil> no idea on my end what to do next...

22:34 <freemangordon> jonwil: I will look at how are mudrc functions called in the -record module

22:34 <jonwil> ok

22:34 <freemangordon> you could do the same as well :)

22:34 <freemangordon> jonwil: or...

22:35 <jonwil> I cant do anything today, I am busy :)

22:35 <freemangordon> get that code from pastebin and confirm I am not doing something stupid and the outputs really match

22:35 <freemangordon> oh, I didn;t mean today :)

22:35 <jonwil> ok

22:36 <freemangordon> ...

22:36 <freemangordon> or invent your own test cases

22:36 <freemangordon> hoever, I am going afk :)

22:36 <freemangordon> night guys