08:43 <mithro> I didn't get to the make retry fix or getting Kokoro setup on Arch-Defs today

22:42 <elms> @litghost

22:44 <elms> oops early enter. fasm question: are routing and buffers designated destination.src? is that a convention or for a specific reason?

22:45 <litghost> Ya, it's tile.dest.src

22:45 <litghost> The original idea was potential to have enum like things, e.g. tile.dest = src

22:45 <litghost> where src is an enum of possibilities

22:45 <litghost> This is now being handled via the zero bit groups

22:46 <litghost> regardless, the convention has stayed

22:47 <elms> ok I can stick to it for iCE40. The icestorm organization tends to be src first.

22:49 <elms> icestorm is also using '/' in names. It's not supported in FASM currently. Any thoughts on adding as an allowed character?

22:53 <litghost> Example? I'm pretty sure we don't want to allow '/'

22:57 <elms> icesotrm has lutff_7/out and similar. I could replace with and make it lutff_7_out. is there a specific reason to disallow it? I could see it being slightly confusing, but wasn't sure if there is more

23:01 <litghost> The conventional replacement would be luff_7.out

23:02 <litghost> Depending on what lutff_7/out is

23:02 <litghost> Is it an output enable feature?

23:02 <litghost> Or a mux select?

23:03 <elms> it's the output wire from the 7th lutff

23:04 <elms> there are also lutff_[0-7]/in_[0-3]

23:06 <litghost> So lutff_7/out would appear in a FASM directive at all, unless you have a pip going to or from it?

23:06 <litghost> wouldn't*

23:07 <litghost> What would be an example feature directive using either the out or in wires?

23:11 <elms> I guess that't what I'm tying to make sure I follow convention. e.g. LOGIC_TILE_X6_Y8.LOCAL_G1_7.LUTFF_7/OUT

23:13 <litghost> Ya, that would be LOGIC_TILE_X6_Y8.LOCAL_G1_7.LUTFF_7_OUT

23:13 <litghost> I think it would be confusing to have '/' for 'Identifier' s

23:14 <litghost> It mixes hierarchy

23:14 <elms> sounds good. Thanks

23:59 <mithro> litghost: I don't think it makes sense to request my review on prjxray changes - I don't feel like I can give that meaningful review

23:59 <mithro> elms / litghost: Has is the status on a FASM style guide?

23:59 <mithro> I assume no progress?