sipa changed the topic of #bitcoin-wizards to: This channel is for discussing theoretical ideas with regard to cryptocurrencies, not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja
Aaronvan_ has quit []
davec has joined #bitcoin-wizards
chjj has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has quit [Quit: oleganza]
chjj has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jtimon has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
praxeology1 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
dabura667 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rmwb has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rmwb has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
oleganza has quit [Quit: oleganza]
shesek has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
dnaleor has quit [Quit: Leaving]
instagibbs has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
instagibbs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jephalien_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bxbxb has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
kisspunch has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
sipa has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
sipa has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Murch has quit [Quit: Snoozing.]
Dizzle has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kisspunch has joined #bitcoin-wizards
bxbxb has joined #bitcoin-wizards
praxeology has joined #bitcoin-wizards
shesek has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has quit [Quit: bye]
praxeology1 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has joined #bitcoin-wizards
praxeology1 has left #bitcoin-wizards [#bitcoin-wizards]
praxeology has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
praxeology1 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<praxeology1> A hash tree structure created in the background for a periodic utxo snapshots... could use the same method of hashing as the rolling add/subtractable hash... for each of its nodes... so its root hash would be equal to the rolling hash. Then we just need to agree on the order of adding to the tree and number of children per node... in order for people to be able to download from multiple sources
Murch has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rmwb has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-wizards
legogris has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
legogris has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
TheSeven has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
TheSeven has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<gmaxwell> that makes no sense.
<gmaxwell> you basically destroy the value of he rolling hash that way.
rmwb has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<gmaxwell> the rolling hash doesn't need to be anything but a rolling hash. you can download from multiple sources already.
<gmaxwell> by using implementation specific commitments.
TheSeven has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
TheSeven has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<praxeology1> When you download a piece, how do you know whether you are making progress towards a rolling hash, until you are done?
<praxeology1> Maybe I was thinking it would be easier than it actually would be to make this tree structure. With the rolling hash functions suggested... does ((A+B)+C)+D equal (A+B) + (C+D)?
<gmaxwell> with the implementation specific commitment information.
<praxeology1> Wouldn't what you are suggesting result in a completely different hash for the snapshot (for synchronization purposes) than the utxo rolling hash?
<praxeology1> Assuming your answer is yes, sure, that would still work.
<gmaxwell> the distinction is that it doesn't matter how long it takes to compute the hashes used in fetching because they're only computed for authoring new versions, and they're implementation specific, so it doesn't matter that they've made the encoding and ordering normative.
<wallet42> I've been recently thinking about roll-over transaction fees. has anyone done some research into this direction? I like to think of money that _actually_ spent on transaction fees to use a block chain's ability to reassign value from one public key to another as a metric for real usage (compared to speculative only usage by custodial wallets in exchanges volume). The problem is, once this metric is being
<wallet42> used by others its also pretty easy to game by a miner. They just create fake transactions into their own blocks with high fees, they wont risk losing anything since they are mining their own transactions.
<wallet42> the idea would be to have a softfork which forces miners to only collect like 1/6th of the current block's transactions fees and issue 5/6th to a second, OP_TRUE output, in the coinbase.
<wallet42> the coins are still locked in there for 120 blocks but the first miner to find the block then, can collect those
<gmaxwell> wallet42: those schemes strongly incentivize fees to move out of band.
<gmaxwell> e.g. miners announce that they'll accept fees paid to outputs with the correct horse stapler battery key, and the 'fee' of the transaction is set to zero.
<gmaxwell> so then all the fee goes to the miner who made the block, and none rolls forward.
<wallet42> but there would still be competition. if your out of band fee is higher than the public one, i will chose the public route
<gmaxwell> as an aside, your soffork is somewhat impeded by the fact that that coinbase isn't spendable for 100 blocks, ideally you'd like the next block to be able to spend it.
<gmaxwell> wallet42: the out of band one would always be lower, because all the fees go to me.
<gmaxwell> (if I'm a miner)
<gmaxwell> if it would take a fee of 1 to mine your transaction where I only get a sixth... then I'd accept a transaction with a fee of one sixth via an OOB mechenism where I get all of it.
<wallet42> oh now i see...
<wallet42> can we ban transactions that don't pay a fee?
<gmaxwell> no, because then I make the fee 1 satoshi, and then they "pay a fee", but not really.
<gmaxwell> Otherwise it introduces an economic parameter into the system (by that I means some varable that 'knows' the value of a bitcoin)
<wallet42> yeah... that would be a dangerous road to go down
<praxeology1> wallet42: you could create an altcoin where some amount of coin burn is required... but who would use that vs a more efficient competing distributed currency?
<wallet42> btw do we have any metrics on how many transactions are "new"? e.g. haven't been seen in the mempool by long running nodes before making it into a block?
<wallet42> praxeology1: I don't think people want another altcoin /s
<praxeology1> "As the update operations are also associative, H(a)+H(b)+H(c)+H(d) can in fact be computed as (H(a)+H(b)) + (H(c)+H(d))." Well, there is the answer to my above question of whether such a hash tree would be feasible, that computes to the same hash as the rolling hash.
<praxeology1> gmaxwell: sorry, I don't follow how making the "implementation specific "commitments"" cannot use the same hashing function as the rolling hash for parallelized/distributed downloading of pieces. And I don't see how such "destroys" the value of the rolling hash. I'm not implying that such a structure must be made immediately... can be made in the background and non-available until complete.
<praxeology1> Unless of course there is significant performance difference between the rolling hash function and something like plain old SHA256
dudeguy has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has quit [Quit: oleganza]
dudeguy has quit [Quit: Page closed]
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has quit [Client Quit]
airbreather has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
rusty1 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rusty1 has quit [Changing host]
rusty1 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rusty has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
Dizzle has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
<sipa> praxeology1: the rolling hash functions are many times slower
<gmaxwell> praxeology1: if you combine the two you get the disadvantages of both.
<gmaxwell> praxeology1: the result is no longer rolling, it's no longer implementation independant, and it's no longer fast like sha2.
Giszmo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
BashCo has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
rmwb has quit []
BashCo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
JackH has joined #bitcoin-wizards
stiell has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
stiell has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
MaxSan has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
afk11 has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
afk11 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Murch has quit [Quit: Snoozing.]
MaxSan has joined #bitcoin-wizards
MaxSan has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dyaheon has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
dnaleor has joined #bitcoin-wizards
dabura667 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Guest53077 has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Hunger has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Hunger is now known as Guest41118
Meeh has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jtimon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Meeh has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has quit [Changing host]
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kenshi84 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has quit [Changing host]
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CheckDavid has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
airbreather has joined #bitcoin-wizards
MaxSan has joined #bitcoin-wizards
stiell has quit [*.net *.split]
Belkaar has quit [*.net *.split]
jannes has quit [*.net *.split]
harrow has quit [*.net *.split]
mr_burdell has quit [*.net *.split]
otoburb has quit [*.net *.split]
zxzzt has quit [*.net *.split]
morcos has quit [*.net *.split]
morcos has joined #bitcoin-wizards
mr_burdell has joined #bitcoin-wizards
zxzzt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
harrow has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jannes has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
otoburb has joined #bitcoin-wizards
stiell has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Yogh has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Yogh has joined #bitcoin-wizards
belcher has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Meeh has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rasengan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Meeh has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dyaheon has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
prime has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Eliel has joined #bitcoin-wizards
prime is now known as Guest12242
Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
gill3s has joined #bitcoin-wizards
str4d has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rasengan has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
dnaleor has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Guest12242 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
prime_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
bxbxb has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.6.3+deb1 - http://znc.in]
oleganza has quit [Quit: oleganza]
deusexbeer has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
bxbxb has joined #bitcoin-wizards
uiuc-slack has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
uiuc-slack has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rasengan has quit [Changing host]
rasengan has joined #bitcoin-wizards
deusexbeer has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-wizards
JackH has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
tiagotrs has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
dnaleor has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dyaheon has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
marcoagner has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
hasten has joined #bitcoin-wizards
hasten has quit [Client Quit]
hasten has joined #bitcoin-wizards
hasten has quit [Client Quit]
marcoagner has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has quit [Changing host]
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
praxeology1 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Noldorin has joined #bitcoin-wizards
fletom has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Noldorin has quit [Client Quit]
CryptAxe has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Noldorin has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CryptAxe has left #bitcoin-wizards [#bitcoin-wizards]
Giszmo has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
dnaleor has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Dyaheon has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
praxeology has joined #bitcoin-wizards
praxeology has left #bitcoin-wizards [#bitcoin-wizards]
huseby has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<bsm117532> "constructing time-lock puzzles with a “gap” between the work of the puzzle generator and the parallel time of the solver cannot be done in the random-oracle model."
<bsm117532> I'm looking for a way to measure time using a sequential operation (like a Rivest et al timelock) that does not have the trusted setup requirement and can be verified faster than it can be generated.
<bsm117532> Just in case anyone has any ideas...
Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
rusty has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
rusty1 has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
<kanzure> what is a verification of a timeloc?
<kanzure> timelock?
prime has joined #bitcoin-wizards
prime is now known as Guest74321
<bsm117532> kanzure: Consider if someone gave you N=p*q as the product of two primes, which you will compute 2^2^t mod N by sequential squaring. I'm interested in the value t as a measurement of how long a computation took (e.g. a highly-parallelizable PoW computation)
<bsm117532> e.g. as a replacement for the timestamp field in a Bitcoin block header, which can be easily falsified and used in timewarp attacks. I want a direct proof of elapsed time instead.
prime_ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
<bsm117532> So, this is not a timelock, but uses the same algorithm for a different purpose...
priidu has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<bsm117532> For reference, the Rivest et al algorithm: https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/lcs35-puzzle-description.txt
<gmaxwell> bsm117532: using P Q you know the group order do you can just reduce mod that and compute it directly. :P
<bsm117532> gmaxwell: yes that is how you verify the "proof of time" if you know P and Q. The idea is that the person proving elapsed time does not know P and Q.
<bsm117532> So I'd prefer another algorithm that doesn't have this flaw...
<bsm117532> Otherwise you might invent some algorithm where a miner reveals P and Q to collect his coinbase and publishes N for the next miner...but I can see a lot of ways to cheat such a system.
Guest41118 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Hunger- has joined #bitcoin-wizards
fletom has joined #bitcoin-wizards
chjj has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
BashCo has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
BashCo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
BashCo has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
chjj has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jtimon has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
BashCo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
BashCo_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
smk has joined #bitcoin-wizards
BashCo has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
Belkaar has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
Dyaheon has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
blackwraith has joined #bitcoin-wizards
priidu has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
arubi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
arubi has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jtimon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
airbreather has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
oleganza has quit [Quit: oleganza]
tiagotrs has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
sipa has quit [Changing host]
sipa has joined #bitcoin-wizards
oleganza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Aaronvan_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Guest74321 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Guyver2 has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
packetsmurf has joined #bitcoin-wizards
coinsmurf has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
smk has quit [Quit: Page closed]
<Taek> mining pools that make out-of-band deals for fee revenue don't have to disclose those deals to their miners, allowing them to hide revenue and take larger fees
<gmaxwell> yup
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
belcher has quit [Quit: Leaving]
tiagotrs has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
spinza has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...]
marcoagner has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
spinza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Guest76289 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
chjj has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
str4d has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
eddiewang has joined #bitcoin-wizards
chjj has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tiagotrs has joined #bitcoin-wizards
chjj has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
chjj has joined #bitcoin-wizards
sausage_factory has joined #bitcoin-wizards
blackwraith has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]