aschmahmann changed the topic of #ipfs to: Heads Up: To talk, you need to register your nick! Announcements: go-ipfs 0.7.0 and js-ipfs 0.52.3 are out! Get them from dist.ipfs.io and npm respectively! | Also: #libp2p #ipfs-cluster #filecoin #ipfs-dev | IPFS: https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs | Logs: https://view.matrix.org/room/!yhqiEdqNjyPbxtUjzm:matrix.org/ | Forums: https://discuss.ipfs.io | Code of Conduct: https://git.io/vVBS0
lord| has quit [Quit: https://i.imgur.com/xacQ09F.mp4]
lord| has joined #ipfs
Nact has joined #ipfs
<ipfsbot> Jesse @ki4jgt posted in Wrong wireType while publishing name - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/wrong-wiretype-while-publishing-name/10044/1
RingtailedFox has joined #ipfs
dwinkl[m] has joined #ipfs
lawid has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
lawid has joined #ipfs
ch1pp3w4 has joined #ipfs
lawid has quit [Quit: lawid]
lawid has joined #ipfs
<fiveseven[m]> is there a better workflow for updating a dataset that's on ipns besides: `ipfs add <file>` -> `ipfs files cp <file> <path>` -> `ipfs name publish <path CID>` ? this is getting quite tedious and the publish takes quite a while every time.
<fiveseven[m]> * is there a better workflow for updating a dataset that's on ipns besides: `ipfs add <file>` -> `ipfs files cp <file> <path>` -> `ipfs name publish <path parent folder CID>` ? this is getting quite tedious and the publish takes quite a while every time.
Newami has joined #ipfs
Newami has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
}ls{ has quit [Quit: real life interrupt]
<snovak[m]> Just discovered Mastodon. So stoked. https://youtu.be/IPSbNdBmWKE
nfip^ has quit []
kn0rki has quit [Quit: Leaving]
pecastro has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mowcat has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
daMaestro has joined #ipfs
ch1pp3w4 has quit [Quit: leaving]
LHLaurini has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
sonicderdon[m] has joined #ipfs
drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
drathir_tor has joined #ipfs
tsrt^ has joined #ipfs
Roumania has joined #ipfs
Roumania has quit [K-Lined]
daaaft[m] has joined #ipfs
celsoazevedo[m] has joined #ipfs
koo5 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
hurikhan77 has quit [Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
arcatech has joined #ipfs
hurikhan77 has joined #ipfs
keleathi[m] has joined #ipfs
keleathi[m] has left #ipfs [#ipfs]
jessehattabaugh has quit [Quit: Leaving]
drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
drathir_tor has joined #ipfs
bqv has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
bqv has joined #ipfs
tsrt^ has quit []
vs^ has joined #ipfs
hackersCardgame_ has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
jrt has quit [Killed (beckett.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]
jrt has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jcea has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
drathir_tor has joined #ipfs
cubemonkey has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
chachasmooth has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
chachasmooth has joined #ipfs
D_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
bcows has joined #ipfs
dqx_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
bcow has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Nact has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
_whitelogger has joined #ipfs
RingtailedFox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
RingtailedFox has joined #ipfs
bqv has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
bqv has joined #ipfs
MDude has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
rrrap has joined #ipfs
<rrrap> hi everyone, quick question, i am using the JS api, and I want to sign a DAG node with my private key, how can i do that?
<rrrap> i've scoured through the docs, and i'm worried that it might not be possible
<vaultec81[m]1> <rrrap "hi everyone, quick question, i a"> IPFS doesn't have signing functionality for data. You can however sign a IPNS record and essentially prove the public key is pointing to a certain CID
skywavesurfer has quit [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in]
<vaultec81[m]1> You will have to use a common javascript crypto library for that
skywavesurfer has joined #ipfs
<rrrap> that works for 'short term' signing, but unfortunately that can't really be (practically) used to sign data in the long term
<rrrap> it's a shame, i was hoping to use an IPFS priv/pub key for crypto in my app - it would've been a nice simplification
<rrrap> Although I'm having second thoughts on that, "Like HTTP, IPFS does not have user identity built into the protocol." https://blog.ipfs.io/2020-06-11-identity-ipfs-ion/
<rrrap> I guess that I'm trying to co-opt IPNS as a user identity? Which, if I may so, isn't an _entirely_ crazy idea, is it?
bqv has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.0]
vs^ has quit []
itzmeanjan[m] has joined #ipfs
<rrrap> Second thought... (pardon me thinking out loud)... i think i need to write my own IPNS-like app ontop of IPFS
chadover[m] has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
paxospuppet[m] has joined #ipfs
uehhtnefa^ has joined #ipfs
arcatech has joined #ipfs
bqv has joined #ipfs
jamiew has quit [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in]
jamiew has joined #ipfs
mindCrime_ has quit [Excess Flood]
mindCrime_ has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
LiftLeft has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
rrrap has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
hqdruxn08_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
hqdruxn08_ has joined #ipfs
justanotherdude has joined #ipfs
RingtailedFox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
GvP has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
GvP has joined #ipfs
RingtailedFox has joined #ipfs
justanotherdude has quit [Quit: RAGEQUIT]
mindCrime_ is now known as mindCrime
justanotherdude has joined #ipfs
bqv has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
}ls{ has joined #ipfs
Caterpillar has joined #ipfs
teashophouse[m] has joined #ipfs
<vaultec81[m]1> <rrrap "Second thought... (pardon me thi"> You can technically use the key system as identities, or use peerIds are identities
<vaultec81[m]1> There is also orbitdb which operates ontop of IPFS which I am actually looking into using for a production user application
<vaultec81[m]1> If you've asking about identification of nodes than the PeerId does more enough to handle that particular aspect
RingtailedFox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
RingtailedFox has joined #ipfs
<vaultec81[m]1> Really, user identity and content distribution are two separate things. IPFS is meant for distributing data sets, not an account system per say.
<vaultec81[m]1> <rrrap "that works for 'short term' sign"> I was doing some research into signing IPLD objects awhile back. It is actually possible to sign an IPLD object and keep a very similar structure to the original copy. One mechanism to do this is take the original CID, then add it to IPFS, then create another IPLD which references the CID and packs a signature around it. This retains the original copy while also creating a signed
<vaultec81[m]1> verifiable copy. IMO it's a great way to do this and aligns with the spirit of IPLD.
<vaultec81[m]1> > <@freenode_rrrap:matrix.org> Second thought... (pardon me thinking out loud)... i think i need to write my own IPNS-like app ontop of IPFS
<vaultec81[m]1> * You can technically use the key system as identities, or use peerIds are identities. It's possible to export the PeerId priv/pub key, and the other IPNS keys stored in the datastore.
daMaestro has quit [Quit: Leaving]
euod[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
wuji[m] has joined #ipfs
ennuikend[m] has joined #ipfs
tryte has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
tryte has joined #ipfs
lknkm[m] has joined #ipfs
dlc-devel[m] has joined #ipfs
dlc-devel[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
dlc-devel[m] has joined #ipfs
kfoxxy2[m] has joined #ipfs
b1nch0[m] has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
LPS[m] has joined #ipfs
eponymous[m] has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has joined #ipfs
Ringtailed-Fox has joined #ipfs
RingtailedFox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
wallacer has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
wallacer has joined #ipfs
bqv has joined #ipfs
bcows has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
yazou[m] has joined #ipfs
alexul[m] has joined #ipfs
Ringtailed-Fox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Ringtailed-Fox has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has quit [Excess Flood]
mindCrime has joined #ipfs
fire-alpaka[m] has joined #ipfs
i7heaven has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
i7heaven has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
i7heaven has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mindCrime has joined #ipfs
gniux has joined #ipfs
<ipfsbot> FledgeShiu @FledgeXu posted in Small example for IPFS in Browser - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/small-example-for-ipfs-in-browser/10045/1
bqv has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
BlackYoup has quit [Quit: Bridge terminating on SIGTERM]
BlackYoup has joined #ipfs
pecastro has joined #ipfs
<kfoxxy2[m]> When is encryption and privacy coming to ipfs?
ariner[m] has joined #ipfs
kn0rki has joined #ipfs
kfatehi[m] has joined #ipfs
<kfatehi[m]> hi. looking for a sanity safe space. maybe ipfs is it
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quit]
ipfs-stackbot has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tuppaa[m] has joined #ipfs
ipfs-stackbot has joined #ipfs
hurikhan77 has quit [Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
jisakiel[m] has joined #ipfs
jisakiel[m] has left #ipfs [#ipfs]
dqx_ has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
dqx_ has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
dqx_ has joined #ipfs
LiftLeft has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
METAXA[m] has joined #ipfs
bunny_the_lifegu has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
ShadeJonathan[m] has quit [Quit: authenticating]
ShadeJonathan[m] has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
worc3131 has joined #ipfs
i7heaven has joined #ipfs
hurikhan77 has joined #ipfs
Pie-jacker875 has joined #ipfs
i7heaven has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
roebuck[m] has joined #ipfs
alphazulu[m] has joined #ipfs
gniux has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.7]
dragongod[m] has joined #ipfs
i7heaven has joined #ipfs
jebba has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
jamiew has quit [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in]
jamiew has joined #ipfs
jebba has joined #ipfs
hackersCardgame_ has joined #ipfs
kaangoksal[m] has joined #ipfs
LHLaurini has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has joined #ipfs
jcea has joined #ipfs
darkcodi[m] has joined #ipfs
adonese[m] has joined #ipfs
<ipfsbot> Jesse @ki4jgt posted in Another Social Network for IPFS. . . Oh My! - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/another-social-network-for-ipfs-oh-my/10048/1
worc3131 has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
alexgr has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
MDude has joined #ipfs
alexgr has joined #ipfs
Ringtailed-Fox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Ringtailed-Fox has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
halmex[m] has joined #ipfs
hackersCardgame_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
mindlessrational has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
dc0d has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
dc0d has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has joined #ipfs
Ringtailed-Fox has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Ringtailed-Fox has joined #ipfs
worc3131 has joined #ipfs
Telmeh has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Telmeh has joined #ipfs
PendulumSwinger has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
PendulumSwinger has joined #ipfs
chicoxyzzy has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
betawaffle has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
chicoxyzzy has joined #ipfs
Fabricio20 has quit [Quit: Disconnected]
spinza has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...]
Fabricio20 has joined #ipfs
betawaffle has joined #ipfs
spinza has joined #ipfs
captain_morgan has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
captain_morgan has joined #ipfs
worc3131 has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
Mikaela has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Mikaela has joined #ipfs
Jeanne-Kamikaze has joined #ipfs
dacbarbos[m] has joined #ipfs
highsea[m] has joined #ipfs
__jrjsmrtn__ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
copycopy[m] has joined #ipfs
__jrjsmrtn__ has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
mfi_ has joined #ipfs
mfi_ has quit [Client Quit]
mfi_ has joined #ipfs
<ipfsbot> Mike Demit @mxp posted in Building a GeoCities like system on IPFS - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/building-a-geocities-like-system-on-ipfs/10053/1
virtugrana[m] has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Quit: Gone to Croatan...]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
rsheftel88 is now known as rsheftel
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
gavlee has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
dqx_ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
mowcat has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ZaZ has joined #ipfs
dqx_ has joined #ipfs
worc3131 has joined #ipfs
philippwalter[m] has joined #ipfs
jakarjakar[m] has joined #ipfs
arcatech has joined #ipfs
jess has joined #ipfs
Jeanne-Kamikaze has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Telmeh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jadedctrl_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Telmeh has joined #ipfs
worc3131 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
maggotbrain has joined #ipfs
ZaZ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Telmeh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
silotis has quit [Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
bcows has joined #ipfs
rathel[m] has joined #ipfs
silotis has joined #ipfs
bqv has joined #ipfs
bcows has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
bcows has joined #ipfs
<ipfs-stackbot> New IPFS question on StackOverflow: How to encrypt and store files in IPFS such that only certain people can unencrypt and see the file? - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65970653/how-to-encrypt-and-store-files-in-ipfs-such-that-only-certain-people-can-unencry
jadedctrl has joined #ipfs
arcatech has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Client Quit]
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quit]
LHLaurini has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
Jad has joined #ipfs
<ipfsbot> @christroutner posted in IPFS replacement for REST API - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/ipfs-replacement-for-rest-api/10054/1
tolecnal[m] has joined #ipfs
constantlogix[m] has joined #ipfs
pfault[m] has joined #ipfs
spinza has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
GvP has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya!]
spinza has joined #ipfs
arcatech has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Client Quit]
<srid> > Most decentralized platforms (mastodon, **IPFS**, XMPP, Matrix...) have mechanisms to block and defederate unwanted accounts/contents/servers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25968563
<srid> How exactly does this "block and defederate" work in IPFS?
<swedneck> just don't request data you don't like
<swedneck> the same way it works in torrent, don't start a torrent you don't want
<srid> I'm considering if that person who wrote that comment is accurate or wrong, in regards to IPFS.
<srid> * I'm wondering if that person who wrote that comment is accurate or wrong, in regards to IPFS.
<srid> Like, if I my peer as `cat.jpg` pinned, do other peers have the *capability* block my peer because they don't like cats?
<srid> * Like, if I my peer has `cat.jpg` pinned, do other peers have the _capability_ block my peer because they (on behalf of some people) don't like cats?
<srid> * Like, if I my peer has `cat.jpg` pinned, do other peers have the _capability_ to block my peer entirely because they (on behalf of some people) don't like cats?
<swedneck> <srid "Like, if I my peer as `cat.jpg` "> yes, but why would they?
zombie_reddy[m] has joined #ipfs
<srid> "block" has two-way communication is blocked
<swedneck> <srid ""block" has two-way communicatio"> again, what would be the benefit of blocking a node?
<srid> <nimaje "well, there is https://github.co"> This is denying individual CIDs, rather than whole peers, right?
<nimaje> why two-way? why should the blocked peer need to know that someone has blocked them
<srid> <swedneck "again, what would be the benefit"> If you rely on a IPFS gateway that hates cats, you can't access `cat.jpg`. You'll be forced to find a gateway that doesn't hate cats.
<fehmitn[m]> can i create a chat app in ipfs by creating a text file between 2 users when the 2 user can write on the same file when they 'chat'
<swedneck> <srid "If you rely on a IPFS gateway th"> what does that have to do with blocking *nodes*?
<srid> (Bear with me folks, I'm not 100% knowledgeable of how IPFS works under hood; just wondering from a social/censorship perspective)
<srid> * "block" as in, two-way communication is blocked
<srid> jan Swedneck: If the gateway host (say cloudflare-ipfs) decided to block $peer that hosts `cat.jpg`, because cloudflare hates cats, then users who happens to use cloudflare-ipfs will be blocked from access cat.jpg ... unless they know to try other gateways that do not have it in their denylist, correct?
<swedneck> <fehmitn[m] "can i create a chat app in ipfs"> no, however you could use pubsub
<srid> * jan Swedneck: If the gateway host (say cloudflare-ipfs) decided to block $peer that hosts `cat.jpg`, because cloudflare hates cats, then users who happen to use cloudflare-ipfs will be blocked from accessing cat.jpg ... unless they know to try other gateways that do not have it in their denylist, correct?
<swedneck> <srid "jan Swedneck: If the gateway hos"> anyone can host the file, blocking a single peer is next to pointless
<fehmitn[m]> i suppose the problem of pubsub is that if you are not conected you miss what was saiyed in past
<srid> If all of sudden the American government passes a rule that all IPFS peers must block a given list of peers, that would still be pointless? Because users can connect to non-American peers to access the content?
<srid> * An extreme picture might be helpful. If all of sudden the American government passes a rule that all IPFS peers must block a given list of peers, that would still be pointless? Because users can connect to non-American peers to access the content?
<vaultec81[m]1> <srid "If all of sudden the American go"> That would assume everyone would comply to enforce the rule in the first place.
<vaultec81[m]1> Easy for those said peers to rotate and change their peerids
<fehmitn[m]> i suppose internet provider could block ipfs protocols
<swedneck> <fehmitn[m] "i suppose the problem of pubsub "> yep, if you want to make a chat app on ipfs i'd suggest looking at how existing ones do it, like orbitchat
<fehmitn[m]> but they didint do it for torrent
<srid> Alright, so the Hacker News fellow who wrote "Most decentralized platforms (mastodon, IPFS, XMPP, Matrix...) have mechanisms to block and defederate unwanted accounts/contents/servers:" is wrong in regards to IPFS.
<vaultec81[m]1> <fehmitn[m] "i suppose internet provider coul"> Also IPFS supports multiple transport and encryptions protocols, so this might be more difficult than it may seem.
<swedneck> <srid "Alright, so the Hacker News fell"> pretty much yes, it makes no sense to include ipfs there to begin with
<swedneck> many people have a strange idea that ipfs is a platform, not just a content distribution protocol
<srid> I don't know how to peer discovery works. I guess even if a bunch of actors decided to utilize a peers.denylist file, one would still be able to transitively discover them via other generous peers (without a denylist)
<fehmitn[m]> ipfs is just bittorent withour traker
<srid> * I don't know how peer discovery works. I guess even if a bunch of actors decided to utilize a peers.denylist file, one would still be able to transitively discover them via other generous peers (without a denylist)
<srid> * I don't know how peer discovery works. I guess even if a bunch of actors decided to utilize a peers.denylist file, one would still be able to transitively discover them via other generous peers (that don't have a peer denylist)
<vaultec81[m]1> <srid "I don't know how to peer discove"> Also keep in mind that denylist.conf that was sent above was for content CIDs not peerIds
<swedneck> <srid "I don't know how to peer discove"> basically when starting a node it connects to a list of bootstrap peers and asks them for a list of their peers, and then you continue asking nodes for more and more peers until satisfied
<fehmitn[m]> can an iot device like esp32 acces to the ipfs network
<swedneck> you can also manually connect to peers
<srid> How is the list bootstrap peers decided?
<srid> * How is the list of bootstrap peers decided?
<swedneck> <srid "How is the list bootstrap peers "> the default is just a bunch of peers hosted by the ipfs team, but you can modify it however you want without any effort
<swedneck> it's literally a plaintext list in the config file
<srid> Gotcha.
<srid> Of course, peer to peer .. only way to block is at the network/ISP level. Cool.
<swedneck> oh also you can automatically discover peers on the local network using mdns
<srid> I should try to figure that in NixOS
<srid> As well setup cluster, as soon as this gets landed: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/100871
<swedneck> and another important detail is that nodes can forward data, or are supposed to be able to at least
<swedneck> not certain how well that functions currently
<srid> "forward"?
<vaultec81[m]1> Essentially proxy
<vaultec81[m]1> Act as a relay between two different nodes
<srid> By the way, when a node asks the peers it knows for the content of a CID - does it fetch from one peer? Or does it fetch the data in parallel (in blocks) from multiple peers that has that CID?
<swedneck> yes
<swedneck> urp that wasn't an answer to that last question
lavaplanet[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
<srid> If I'm fetching 1GB video file, it would be faster to fetch it in parallel from multiple peers (each of which might have limited bandwidth)
<vaultec81[m]1> I believe so yeah
<swedneck> pretty sure this is the relevant protocol for exchanging data
<vaultec81[m]1> A marketplace for blocks of data!
bqv has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
<swedneck> ok so yeah it seems you will get data from multiple peers
<srid> Interesting
<swedneck> * ok so yeah it seems you will get data from multiple peers at once
<srid> Is there a way to see these peer communication activity? A version of `ipfs get` that prints the activity in verbose detail
<srid> `ipfs stats bitswap` gives overall stats, but I'd like to know, for example, how many blocks were fetched from how many peers, when retrieving a CID from IPFS
<swedneck> probably by using `ipfs log` somehow?
<swedneck> looking at it rn
arcatech has joined #ipfs
fjkhhj has joined #ipfs
justanotherdude has quit [Quit: RAGEQUIT]
justanotherdude has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
fjkhhj has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<srid> Is there a way to pin a folder recursively in the webui? Currently, I have to manually pin each file in it.
<swedneck> can't you just click the pin button on the folder?
<srid> I did, a few a days. But when I checked today - while the folder is pinned, the files inside it are not. Maybe it is a UI bug.
<srid> * I did, a few days ago. But when I checked today - while the folder is pinned, the files inside it are not. Maybe it is a UI bug.
<swedneck> sounds like a UI bug, i'd suggest opening an issue on github
<srid> Is there a command line equivalent to pin/unpin?
<swedneck> enable the commandline tutorial mode in the webui :P
themsay[m] has joined #ipfs
artful_dodger[m] has joined #ipfs
dirkmc has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
dignifiedquire has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
dirkmc has joined #ipfs
dignifiedquire has joined #ipfs
peleset[m] has joined #ipfs
<srid> Ya, just a webui bug. on CLI, these CIDs are marked as `indirect`
arcatech has joined #ipfs
jokoon has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Client Quit]
tled has joined #ipfs
LEGITtimeTRAVELE has joined #ipfs
mrqweep[m] has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
andyjsbell[m] has joined #ipfs
Jad has quit [Quit: Benefits I derive from free­dom are largely the result of the uses of freedom by others, and mostly of those uses of freedom that I could never avail myself of.]
reero[m] has joined #ipfs
tr00evol has joined #ipfs
tr00evol has quit [Client Quit]
mindCrime has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
mindCrime has joined #ipfs
mfi_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
arcatech has joined #ipfs
mikitte[m] has joined #ipfs
burritos[m] has joined #ipfs
celsoazevedo[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
acexace[m] has joined #ipfs
mooe[m] has joined #ipfs
yassinecc[m] has joined #ipfs
jokoon has quit [Quit: Leaving]
koo5 has joined #ipfs
MDude has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mooe[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
Acacia has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
Acacia has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
oebhne has joined #ipfs
bqv has joined #ipfs
bcows has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<fiveseven[m]> I've seen that before as well
<fiveseven[m]> sometimes they show pinned and other times not
<fiveseven[m]> really wish there was a way to grab content by its full checksum alone, that would be a game-changer
<fiveseven[m]> * really wish there was a way to grab content by its full file checksum alone, that would be a game-changer
<fiveseven[m]> and by 'content-addressable' I always thought that's what was meant... wish it was though
<fiveseven[m]> like I'm not interested in someone else's metadata or how they chunk up the file
<fiveseven[m]> all I care about is the data file as a whole
<fiveseven[m]> and getting that however possible
<fiveseven[m]> without having to know who has it first or what their hash of it is
LEGITtimeTRAVELE has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
MDude has joined #ipfs
jakarjakar[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
JrmeCarretero[m] has joined #ipfs
koo5 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
dqx_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
justanotherdude has quit [Quit: RAGEQUIT]
siddh88[m] has joined #ipfs
}ls{ has quit [Quit: real life interrupt]
Green_Bird has joined #ipfs
sav__ has joined #ipfs
Newami has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quit]
deltab has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
sav__ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
deltab has joined #ipfs
<imthatsteve[m]> I always thought it worked that way too, with one address for the data itself no matter where on the network it was stored or what path it took to you.
<swedneck> that is how it works
<swedneck> however the data is different depending on how it's chunked/hashed, which is necessary for basically everything to work
<ipfsbot> Paul Gessos @nickreserved posted in Make an alternative to an FTP server, over IPFS - https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/make-an-alternative-to-an-ftp-server-over-ipfs/10057/1
MDead has joined #ipfs
MDude has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
MDead is now known as MDude
ipfs-stackbot has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ipfs-stackbot has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has joined #ipfs