aschmahmann changed the topic of #ipfs to: Heads Up: To talk, you need to register your nick! Announcements: go-ipfs 0.7.0 and js-ipfs 0.52.3 are out! Get them from dist.ipfs.io and npm respectively! | Also: #libp2p #ipfs-cluster #filecoin #ipfs-dev | IPFS: https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs | Logs: https://view.matrix.org/room/!yhqiEdqNjyPbxtUjzm:matrix.org/ | Forums: https://discuss.ipfs.io | Code of Conduct: https://git.io/vVBS0
SirPHOENiX16 has joined #ipfs
SirPHOENiX1 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
SirPHOENiX16 is now known as SirPHOENiX1
ipfs-stackbot has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
JonOsterman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
unnamed55355 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
JonOsterman has joined #ipfs
}ls{ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
}ls{ has joined #ipfs
SirPHOENiX14 has joined #ipfs
koo555 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
SirPHOENiX1 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
SirPHOENiX14 is now known as SirPHOENiX1
Acacia has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
Acacia has joined #ipfs
<Narkain>
Shegorath: Unless you make your content where people want to pin it, it will not be decentrally distributed. (Pinning in centralized) So it would be better to say "decentralized of data in demand" which the average person does not typically provide.
<Narkain>
Do not get me wrong, I am not trying to downtalk IPFS in any way. Just that people keep getting confused into thinking it is a system that will automatically make copies of any data they want and maintain it.
haijuno has joined #ipfs
JonOsterman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<proletarius101>
Hi, does anyone know how can I increase the connectivity of my ipfs server (i.e. the number of peers)? I have 4001/tcp and 4001/udp open to 0.0.0.0/0 and I can `ipfs swarm connect /ip4/*/udp/4001/quic` from my laptop. But the number of peers is less than 200 and it takes like forever for ipfs.io to fetch/resolve the content
Nact has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
LHLaurini has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
JonOsterman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
JonOsterman has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
Sappy[m] has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
Pikipeanut has joined #ipfs
Taoki has joined #ipfs
Pikipears has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
Pikipeanut has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
royal_screwup21 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
<Discordian[m]>
<proletarius101 "Hi, does anyone know how can I i"> Are the ports forwarded on your router? 🤔
<Discordian[m]>
<wings[m] "how many pins can you plausibly "> Honestly, I don't have a lot of data on that.
<kallisti5[m]>
Whew... finding a lot support for IPFS from the Haiku community. Who knows... this might go somewher
<kallisti5[m]>
* Whew... finding a lot support for IPFS from the Haiku community. Who knows... this might go somewhere
<kallisti5[m]>
today our software packages update via os tools from http servers. One though was natively supporting ipfs repos (pkgman add-repo ipfs://ipns/hpkg.haiku-os.org) Then our package management software would pull updates from a locally running IPFS server
<kallisti5[m]>
aka, no gateways at all 🎆
<kallisti5[m]>
* today our software packages update via os tools from http servers. One thought was natively supporting ipfs repos (pkgman add-repo ipfs://ipns/hpkg.haiku-os.org) Then our package management software would pull updates from a locally running IPFS server
<Discordian[m]>
:D that's so awesome, having native IPFS going on Haiku ... definitely gonna have to run that on something. Does it run on bare metal? Idr
<kallisti5[m]>
yeah.. we run on bare metal, have NVMe support ,etc
<Discordian[m]>
Oh wow
<kallisti5[m]>
we do lack 3d acceleration... and our web browser is webkit but behind the times
* Discordian[m]
eyes up spare laptop
<kallisti5[m]>
those are our two biggest issues
<Discordian[m]>
That's fine, this whole laptop sucks at 3D acceleration, it'll fit right in
<kallisti5[m]>
lol. nice :-)
<kallisti5[m]>
if you're gonna try it out, be sure to use our nightly images. https://download.haiku-os.org our release image is over a year old now (we need to release another "stable beta")
<Discordian[m]>
Awesome, I was definitely going to do that already
<Discordian[m]>
Interested in that 64bit build 👀
<kallisti5[m]>
yeah. I run it on my Ryzen 1800x with 64GiB of ram.. no real issues.
<kallisti5[m]>
My 10Gbit network card freaks out our network stack though.... I need to debug that one lol
<proletarius101>
<Discordian[m] "Are the ports forwarded on your "> It's on google cloud. I guess you don't need port forwarding due to a dedicated ip address?
<Discordian[m]>
IIRC I supported a GCP user recently and they needed to forward. I think it has a firewall
<kallisti5[m]>
default gcp vpc networks have a firewall
<kallisti5[m]>
you'll need to open 4001 even if you have a external ip assigned
<proletarius101>
<kallisti5[m] "you'll need to open 4001 even if"> Sure, 4001/tcp and 4001/udp are open
<proletarius101>
that's why i can `ipfs swarm connect` to the server
<proletarius101>
actually ipfs.io finally finds my server
<Discordian[m]>
Maybe it just needed time then
<proletarius101>
but it takes a lot of time and refreshes
<kallisti5[m]>
it can take time for the network to find new content... that's something i'm battling with right now
<proletarius101>
is less than 200 peers normal?
<Discordian[m]>
I guess sometimes, I only have 350 peers rn
<kallisti5[m]>
running ```ipfs swarm connect``` does seem to help it find the content faster... but ipfs will disconnect after a set amount of time when "better nodes" come online
<Discordian[m]>
On a good day I have 1100 peers
<proletarius101>
<kallisti5[m] "running ```ipfs swarm connect```"> that only connets two machines i suppose?
<proletarius101>
> <@kallisti5:matrix.org> running ```ipfs swarm connect``` does seem to help it find the content faster... but ipfs will disconnect after a set amount of time when "better nodes" come online
<proletarius101>
* that only connects two machines i suppose?
<kallisti5[m]>
yes. point a to point b.
<kallisti5[m]>
if you publish content on point a, it helps point b find it faster
<proletarius101>
<kallisti5[m] "yes. point a to point b."> but how about ipfs.io as it's more accessible
<kallisti5[m]>
since that's a public gateway, you kinda just have to wait for it to find the content
<proletarius101>
<Discordian[m] "On a good day I have 1100 peers"> yeah, on my laptop without a VPN i usually have 700+ peers.
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
<kallisti5[m]>
I think the pubsub experiment stuff is supposed to speed this up?
<proletarius101>
with a VPN it drops to as low as 150
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
<proletarius101>
<kallisti5[m] "I think the pubsub experiment st"> I'll take a look. Thanks!
<Discordian[m]>
<proletarius101 "I'll take a look. Thanks!"> IPNS resolution? Definitely
<Discordian[m]>
Whoops replied to wrong msg
<proletarius101>
<Discordian[m] "IPNS resolution? Definitely"> an ipns resolution takes forever. an ipfs resolution takes minutes. after that the ipns one works, too
<proletarius101>
the later is expected
<Discordian[m]>
There's IPNS PubSub, it's way faster for resolution than just regular IPNSN
<Discordian[m]>
* There's IPNS PubSub, it's way faster for resolution than just regular IPNS
<proletarius101>
<Discordian[m] "There's IPNS PubSub, it's way fa"> Enabled now by `--enable-pubsub-experiment`. Hopefully it works
<FuseTim[m]>
don't you need that too `--enable-namesys-pubsub` ?
<Discordian[m]>
Oh yes, thanks Tim
<kallisti5[m]>
I do both... not sure both required
mowcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<mike7c2>
Hey! I've been messing about a bit with IPFS and potentially using IPFS and pubsub to run a distributed task handling system. I was looking around to see if someone had already made such a thing