14:25 <mmind00> ukleinek: no problems, just didn't get to it yet

14:25 <mmind00> ukleinek: hopefully do more patches this week

14:33 <ukleinek> mmind00: ok, fine

14:34 <mmind00> ukleinek: I just had half an hour to kill yesterday and grabbed some easy ones

14:35 <ukleinek> mmind00: I was just a bit <insertadjectivehere>, because I got prompt responses when my patch set was still non-optimal and input just stopped for my v4.

14:40 <mmind00> ukleinek: there was a bit much work and "holidays" involved the last weeks

14:41 <ukleinek> mmind00: known problem, I was just surprised by the hard edge

14:41 <ukleinek> mmind00: if you come around to look after my patch, don't forget to add Rob's ack as he promised the maintainer will care for :-)

14:44 <mmind00> ukleinek: :-D thanks for that pointer

14:45 <ukleinek> mmind00: that was a trick. I assume you will decide you will only remember this when you pick up my patch set immediately. :-P

14:46 <mmind00> ukleinek: :-P you assumed correctly

14:46 <mmind00> ukleinek: I just instructed b4 to get you series

14:46 <ukleinek> \o/

14:46 <robmur01> heh, isn't that how reviewing normally goes? First couple of versions you can skim and point out enough obvious issues in 5 minutes; by about v5 you end up having to budget about half a day to cross-check documentation or other implementations, going back to recall reasoning from previous rounds, etc. to convince yourself it's really right

14:47 <robmur01> at least that's how it tends to go for me :D

14:48 <mmind00> robmur01: it's especially fun when the patch touches parts that don't change often .... still need to look at clock patches

14:49 <robmur01> I think there's a couple of series in my inbox that are at about v12 and I hardly dare even look at because there goes most of the rest of the week :P

14:52 <ukleinek> robmur01: with my reviewer hat on I'm sometimes annoyed about myself that I failed to point out stuff in v1 that is unchanged up to (say) v4.

14:52 <ukleinek> so I think doing a careful review for v1 might beneficial for both sides.

14:56 <mmind00> ukleinek: homework ... please do a follow up patch updating Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml ;-)

14:58 <ukleinek> ah, description

15:00 <ukleinek> mmind00: do you prefer a completely new patch, or a fixup!?

15:00 <mmind00> new patch ... I already applied the other 2 ;-)

15:01 <ukleinek> ok

15:02 <mmind00> ukleinek: i.e. in general we have (1) vendor prefix, (2) binding-doc in rockchip.yaml (3) dts ... so that patch was just missing when you post it, we can wait a bit for Robs Ack ... but he said in the past there is no need for a simple compatible

15:07 <ukleinek> mmind00: [x] homework

15:09 <ukleinek> Message-Id: 20201102150658.167161-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org

23:37 <vagrantc> anyone know the status of getting the LCD panel to work on pinebook pro with mainline?

23:38 <vagrantc> i've seen it work with patches from https://gitlab.manjaro.org/tsys/linux-pinebook-pro ... but itk might just be that that config has all the right options enabled