00:15 <GitHub124> [artiq] hartytp opened pull request #882: update hmc830 code. cp to 1.6mA, add docs, other regs to data sheet v… (master...master) https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882

01:29 <GitHub98> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #860: > If you guys can't do that, can you send @gkasprow a binary so that he can, please?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354579412

01:45 <GitHub9> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #882: NB once this all works, we should probably set the lock detect window to 1/2 cycles... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882#issuecomment-354579957

01:51 <GitHub162> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #860: > Why divide the 100MHz reference? The PFD is fully specified to run up to 100MHz.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354580103

02:09 <GitHub98> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #860: Not sure. PFD has a lower rating if used in fractions mode IIRC.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354580683

02:09 <GitHub0> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #860: Not sure. PFD has a lower rating if used in frac-N mode IIRC (we're not doing that, but the eval software may be making it easy for us to try).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354580683

02:12 <GitHub53> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #860: I wouldn't take those recommendations too seriously. They're just giving you something that should work all other things being equal (e.g. loop filter etc). Not a guarantee that it's the best option for you case.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354580767

02:35 <GitHub147> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on pull request #882 636ea75: ```... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882#discussion_r159132689

02:36 <GitHub17> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #882: Can you also align the comments for readability? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882#issuecomment-354581460

02:38 <GitHub90> [artiq] hartytp commented on pull request #882 6f7e5db: oops, sorry! https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882#discussion_r159132712

03:05 <GitHub126> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #860: Made a total of 4 tests (those tests are quite tedious due to slow bitstream loading times, 1V8 bugs, and serwb bugs). Failed twice with your patch, worked twice without. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354582392

03:22 <GitHub16> [artiq] hartytp closed pull request #882: update hmc830 code. cp to 1.6mA, add docs, other regs to data sheet v… (master...master) https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/pull/882

03:23 <GitHub137> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #860: :(... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354582866

03:23 <GitHub109> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #860: :(... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/860#issuecomment-354582866

04:07 <sb0> anyone using artiq_flash load?

04:11 <GitHub71> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/6e0288e56807...100bda2582eb

04:11 <GitHub71> artiq/master 100bda2 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: artiq_flash: ignore RTM FPGA...

04:11 <GitHub71> artiq/master a897d82 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: ad9154: retry initialization (#727)

04:11 <GitHub71> artiq/master 38ce1f1 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: artiq_flash: support flashing satman...

04:25 <GitHub106> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: @jbqubit regarding status, see the multiple emails I sent you, e.g. "Re: RF output from Sayma via ARTIQ" on October 18th. The ball is in your court.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-354584619

04:25 <GitHub131> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: @jbqubit regarding status, see the multiple emails I sent you, e.g. "Re: RF output from Sayma via ARTIQ" on October 18th. The ball is in your court.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-354584619

04:25 <GitHub32> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: @jbqubit regarding status, see the multiple emails I sent you, e.g. "Re: RF output from Sayma via ARTIQ" on October 18th. The ball is in your court.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-354584619

04:30 <GitHub107> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: @jbqubit regarding status, see the multiple emails I sent you, e.g. "Re: RF output from Sayma via ARTIQ" on October 18th. The ball is in your court.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-354584619

04:32 <GitHub11> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: @jbqubit regarding status, see the multiple emails I sent you, e.g. "Re: RF output from Sayma via ARTIQ" on October 18th. The ball is in your court.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-354584619

04:38 <bb-m-labs> build #1015 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1015

04:47 <bb-m-labs> build #664 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/664

04:51 <bb-m-labs> build #1895 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1895

05:30 <GitHub181> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/a1b8bca1e691425b64cfec3c5973e14123ca4cef

05:30 <GitHub181> artiq/master a1b8bca Sebastien Bourdeauducq: Revert "artiq_flash: ignore RTM FPGA"...

06:00 <sb0> whitequark, your new bootloader broke compatibility with the old bios or something.

06:00 <bb-m-labs> build #1016 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1016

06:00 <sb0> the bare BIOS now fails with:

06:00 <sb0> Initializing SDRAM...

06:00 <sb0> Write leveling: 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 failed

06:01 <sb0> and I cannot use your bootloader with the drtio satellite gateware, because it doesn't have ethmac

06:02 <sb0> I really don't need more breakage when debugging sayma... there is such a pervasive level of obnoxious issues already

06:02 <sb0> whitequark, please make sayma3 boot.

06:07 <bb-m-labs> build #665 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/665

06:09 <sb0> oh GOD I got a drtio link

06:10 <sb0> it seems that one pair on sfp0 on sayma2 is fucked, but on sayma3 the same bitstream works

06:10 <bb-m-labs> build #1896 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1896

06:44 <GitHub23> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #793: Got a DRTIO link between Sayma1 (SFP1) and Sayma3 (SFP0) using copper. Seems reliable, though it has only received limited testing since the development cycles on Sayma are so tedious (1V8 bug killing the boards often and at random times, long bitstream loading times, no Ethernet).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/793#issuecomment-354588412

06:49 <GitHub30> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #793: Integrated the code into ARTIQ, cleaned it up, and got a 3Gbps DRTIO link between Sayma1 (SFP1) and Sayma3 (SFP0) using copper. Seems reliable, though it has only received limited testing since the cycles on Sayma are so tedious (1V8 bug killing the boards often and at random times, long bitstream loading times, no Ethernet).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/

08:15 <GitHub68> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #793: @sbourdeauducq: ok good first step. As discussed, i'll finish multi-link initialization and do the tests soon. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/793#issuecomment-354591290

09:06 <whitequark> sb0: ok

09:06 <whitequark> sb0: I have not touched the old BIOS at all...

09:06 <whitequark> hm

09:16 <GitHub20> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/a1b8bca1e691...e1253db0e869

09:16 <GitHub20> artiq/master b8f3d28 whitequark: firmware: update compiler_builtins dependency and move it to libboard....

09:16 <GitHub20> artiq/master e1253db whitequark: firmware: update crc dependency, use it in libdrtioaux.

09:21 <GitHub93> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/e1253db0e869...a371b2552516

09:21 <GitHub93> artiq/master 70ebe43 whitequark: satman: fix build after b8f3d28b.

09:21 <GitHub93> artiq/master a371b25 whitequark: bootloader: allow using without Ethernet.

09:21 <whitequark> sb0: ^

09:29 <GitHub40> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #110 b930d1c: Why not use `Instant` and `Duration`, like libstd does? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/110#discussion_r159136609

09:30 <GitHub70> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #110 b930d1c: ```... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/110#discussion_r159136591

09:31 <GitHub69> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #110 b930d1c: Also, if we go for inherent method `advance`, then I think we should ditch inherent `sub` and go for just `difference` (renamed `saturating_sub`). It's enough to have `-` defined as `checked_sub`, I think... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/110#discussion_r159136642

09:43 <bb-m-labs> build #1017 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1017

09:46 <bb-m-labs> build #1897 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_coverage_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1897 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>

09:56 <GitHub34> [misoc] enjoy-digital pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/misoc/commit/0e710ea78351ae351827d23319f340076dca6cf9

09:56 <GitHub34> misoc/master 0e710ea Florent Kermarrec: bios/sdram: fix merge issue

09:57 <_florent_> sb0, whitequark: sorry it was my fault for the sdram issue.

10:11 <bb-m-labs> build #1018 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1018

10:15 <bb-m-labs> build #330 of misoc is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/misoc/builds/330

10:18 <bb-m-labs> build #666 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/666

10:24 <bb-m-labs> build #1898 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1898

10:58 <rjo> sb0: i am using artiq_flash load

11:19 <GitHub30> [artiq] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/745e695b0948a82cbb99ca8b3c348d8406feed85

11:19 <GitHub30> artiq/master 745e695 Robert Jordens: sayma: output a ramp in the absence of SAWG channels

11:44 <bb-m-labs> build #1019 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1019

11:50 <bb-m-labs> build #667 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/667

11:54 <bb-m-labs> build #1899 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1899

18:46 <sb0> whitequark, thanks