00:42 <GitHub95> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #143: So what's "friendly" about it? I don't see the use case. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143#issuecomment-362753075

00:44 <GitHub116> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #143: @whitequark ... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143#issuecomment-362753486

00:45 <GitHub124> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #143: @whitequark ... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143#issuecomment-362753486

01:07 <GitHub145> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #143: > let hwaddr = EthernetAddress::from([1,2,3,44,5,6]);... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143#issuecomment-362757409

01:09 <GitHub143> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #143: yeah, got it.... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143#issuecomment-362757648

01:17 <GitHub138> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #143: Imp `From` trait on EthernetAddress (master...patch-7) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/143

01:17 <GitHub41> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/400d0e72f501f30665709fd93d594d6596fae8d2

01:17 <GitHub41> smoltcp/master 400d0e7 寧靜: Impl `Hash` trait on EthernetAddress.

01:25 <travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#680 (master - 400d0e7 : 寧靜): The build passed.

01:25 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/d2b8f526f3fd...400d0e72f501

01:25 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/336799922

02:23 <GitHub53> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #142 e087075: According to [IPv6 Essentials](https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/ipv6-essentials/0596001258/):... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801424

02:23 <GitHub52> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #142 e087075: This looks like a bug fix for the existing implementation. Do we need to update existing tests to ensure this behavior stays correct? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801120

02:23 <GitHub110> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #142 e087075: Why create `icmp_reply_repr` if it is only used in one of the match arms? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801201

02:23 <GitHub185> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #142 e087075: This formula is repeated four times (across IPv4 and IPv6). Should it be a function so it is not repeated? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801102

02:26 <GitHub9> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #142 e087075: probably https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801610

02:26 <GitHub49> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #142 e087075: I already have one for UDP... Not sure if one for this case is necessary https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801636

02:28 <GitHub173> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #142 e087075: Yeah, probably not necessary. I just copied ICMPv4. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801674

02:32 <GitHub73> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #142 e087075: Good to know. There are some known ICMPv6 error messages that could hit this. I think this FIXME is largely to pass ICMPv6 error messages to higher layers. (An issue should probably be created for this) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#discussion_r165801903

02:43 <GitHub87> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #142: Updated https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-362770046

04:21 <GitHub66> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: I did not test it on the particular board that I sent Greg, and it also doesn't have the RX clock patch. I believe the next steps should be:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-362778465

05:43 <GitHub43> [smoltcp] LuoZijun opened issue #144: Add function `netmask()` and `broadcast` on Ipv4Cidr/Ipv6Cidr ? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/144

06:28 <GitHub33> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #144: Only on IPv4Cidr, IPv6 does not have netmasks and it only has a single broadcast address, `::`. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/144#issuecomment-362784585

09:09 <sb0> rjo, where is c49?

10:30 <GitHub197> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: > I reflash the MMC on another board, supply a TX clock in gateware and check whether the link gets established or not.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-362796458

10:41 <marbler> hello

10:44 <sb0> hi

10:58 <marbler> I'm an excahnge student in from germany, enrolled at HKUST

10:58 <marbler> i wondered wether it would be interesting to get in touch with you :-)

11:09 <sb0> marbler, sure. what are you into?

11:09 <sb0> how did you hear about m-labs?

11:19 <marbler> I found you reading about migen

11:20 <marbler> Coincidentally, before that, I was already using solvespace

11:21 <sb0> cool

11:23 <marbler> I also do some FPGA stuff, both for college and for fun

11:23 <marbler> I like C and python

11:24 <sb0> do you have a github page?

11:27 <marbler> https://github.com/cyber-murmel

11:27 <marbler> Some of this ist half finished stuff ^^

11:30 <marbler> Oder stuff I did ages ago as a teen :D

11:47 <sb0> marbler, nice, come to the lab someday

11:47 <sb0> it's not far from hkust

11:55 <marbler> Nice

11:55 <marbler> Are there opening hours?

12:08 <sb0> just email me to set a time. I'll be there most of this monday and tuesday afternoon already

12:21 <GitHub146> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #908: I also see the problem with the default build (including SAWG) on ARTIQ 4c22d64ee438d8b65ba728829794698191719181, migen e554f072905ceeb27c9c179c8c7b785acd1676bc, misoc cb8e314c7515eade46f5bcde4e48903d7ec92490... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/908#issuecomment-362802210

12:22 <sb0> whitequark, can you fix the lit test failure on release-3?

12:23 <sb0> I want to release 3.4 on monday

12:23 <sb0> then the next priority is getting those estimates for the issues I emailed you

12:29 <marbler> can anybody suggest a place in HK where i can get stuff laser cut?

12:32 <sb0> marbler, try dimsumlabs. Lio https://twitter.com/LioLunesu is semi-reliable.

12:35 <sb0> we also have a small cnc here though the amount of yak-shaving required to use it is above my patience. you're welcome to try though.

12:36 <sb0> *cnc mill

12:50 <whitequark> sb0: hm

12:51 <whitequark> they all pass locally

12:51 <whitequark> this is probably some conda nonsense again

12:57 <whitequark> yes, of COURSE this is conda nonsense

12:58 <whitequark> artiq: 4.0.dev-py_521+git4c22d64e local

12:58 <whitequark> artiq-dev: 3.3-py_6+git49a26545 local

13:00 <GitHub-m-labs> [buildbot-config] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/vNAjK

13:00 <GitHub-m-labs> buildbot-config/master b894f62 whitequark: Force installation of matching ARTIQ version in conda test environment.

13:02 <whitequark> bb-m-labs: force build --branch=release-3 artiq

13:02 <bb-m-labs> build #2030 forced

13:02 <bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes

13:27 <bb-m-labs> build #1180 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1180

13:28 <bb-m-labs> build #2030 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed artiq_flash] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2030

14:19 <sb0> whitequark, release-3 is supposed to have -I

14:19 <sb0> https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/e1aafcbb4f70bd60e711e26ba93eea6ba727fbf6

14:19 <sb0> so there is still something funny going on

14:23 <bb-m-labs> build #1181 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1181

15:34 <rjo> it's installing an old board package and downgrading artiq in the process

15:38 <travis-ci> batonius/smoltcp#126 (master - 400d0e7 : 寧靜): The build passed.

15:38 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/batonius/smoltcp/compare/c2d18ec071a2...400d0e72f501

15:38 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/batonius/smoltcp/builds/336960069

15:52 <GitHub113> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #908: @sbourdeauducq: yes i'll continue on Monday. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/908#issuecomment-362825084